In James Elkins's great book
Stories of Art, he discusses various personalized "visions" of art history. I would like to cite and highlight one important paragraph here.
Discussing widespread
ahistoricism in internationalist, or what I would term "academicist," Postmodernism, Elkins writes:
"(The list of periods might look like this):
Art History
(No subdivisions)
The Present
Psychologically, such a radically collapsed sense of history is a great relief for people burdened by a nagging sense of the importance of history. Suddenly, all art is possible, and nothing needs to be studied. ... Some art historians who work exclusively on contemporary art feel the same exhilaration: they can apply any theories they want, interpret in any fashion they choose, and cite or ignore precedents at will. But as Milan Kundera might say, sooner or later the apparent lightness of art history reveals itself as an "unbearable lightness," and finally as an unbearable burden."
>Continue
Add a Comment (1)
|
Permalink
|