Heroes: Volume 1







































Corny as it seems, “Greensleeves” is the number that always worked my heart over harder than a lead pipe. More than my eyes or stomach, or even my penis it seems that my ears have always been the express lane to my soul. Whenever I hear “Greensleeves” I immediately begin to drown in an abyss of sorrow. Images of the past begin to flicker on the inside of my eyelids as the home movie of my life suddenly comes into focus: I was ten years old when the coolest kid on the block was riding his bike after dark and killed by a drunk driver. Everybody was devastated. How could a boy of such promise be struck down before his fourteenth birthday? It was at that time that I concluded life made little or no sense at all. Alexander was clearly the kid who had it all - a great athlete with a charismatic smile and a lucky streak a mile long, that was, until fate cruelly cut his short life even shorter.
A few years ago when her only sister Hortense lay on her deathbed, dying of brain cancer, zonked out on morphine, hiding her chemo-bald head under a sparkly bright blue turban, she wouldn’t set foot in her house. From that point on, mom figured Hortense was on her own.

Nominally, this is the story of country boy George Johnston (Alessandro Nivola), who has become citified (in the first two minutes of the film) both by his current residence of Chicago and also his cosmopolitan wife, Madeleine (a luminous Embeth Davidtz). She is an agent for "outsider artists" and so she and her husband head down to North Carolina to attempt contact with a famously reclusive painter clearly modeled on the late Reverend Howard Finster (the guy who painted a few of those early REM album covers). "Junebug" is thus your basic clash-of-culture story, but, to be fair, it is a good deal more sensitive and observant than most. The characters are well drawn and the writing has a good amount of subtlety, but the viewer just keeps waiting for something (besides character-detail sketching) to happen. And then waiting some more.
south. That family features a resigned, somewhat depressed father (a brilliant Scott Wilson, who should take more films, more often), a contrarian mother (Celia Weston), and, most importantly, George's brother Johnny and Johnny's pregnant wife, brilliantly rendered by Amy Adams. Johnny is something of a neer-do-well and the brooding and bubbling menace projected by Ben MacKenzie adds significant suspense to the overall story. All of these characters live under one roof for the duration of the film and a building tension seems to be the main motif.

"Panama Red, red letter, red meat or stumble upon
Redivivus
Redivivus come back
Come back to life"








"The bee-boy, merops apiater, on sultry thundery days filled his bosom between his coarse shirt and his skin with bees--his every meal wild honey."
Make A Rising: Semolina Pilchard's climbing up the Eiffel Tower once again, but this time the Walrus isn't Paul...
Okay, when was the last time you heard an album that combined elements and influences by the following: The Incredible String Band' Hangman's Beautiful Daughter, The Mothers of Invention's Burnt Weeny Sandwich, Beach Boys' Smiley Smile, Love's Forever Changes with sonic shards of Robert Wyatt, Eric Satie riding a bicycle with a flat tire and something that sounds like Harry Partch shaking up a can of spray paint then suddenly smashing Mr. Satie's bike to bits with a shovel which kinda creates music to a French movie I've never seen before.
Then there's some other harder aggressive shit that sounds like King Crimson after a double espresso peyote cocktail. Now you might think I'm kinda gettin' carried away with the metaphors here but I guarantee you if you listen to Make A Rising's first disc Rip Through The Hawk Black Night all of this will be perfectly clear. And I'm sure you're bound to find plenty of your own analogies for this incredibly eclectic stew of a debut.
Now I'm just as jaded as the next guy. As I get older I find I keep going further and further back to check up on what I might've missed. It's pretty hard for me to give five minutes to music that's not made by a dead guy lately. I'm talkin' about before the war - and I don't mean Vietnam! I'm talkin' 'bout the Big One buddy, the one my dad fought so we could be free. But let's just say it goes without saying that Make A Rising kaleidoscopic sonic slop wasn't what he had in mind when he painted my mother's name on the barrel of his rifle to kill Krauts.
Which brings us to that old sport of tension and release, which these guys manage like a tightrope walker trying to keep his footing with a head full of absinthe. This album keeps you on edge. You feel like you're part of a crowd waiting for an accident to happen. At any given moment you expect the whole swirling auditory hallucination to tank. But it never does - it just keeps flippin' the channel on you. Its like that rare occasion New Years Day, when there are five shows on that you wanna watch and they're all on at the same time, so you just keep bouncing back and forth from loopy psychedelic pop songs to rattling avant-garde percussion to kick ass prog-rock licks in some weird timing. Whether through some odd miracle or extra-terrestrial editing skills the album all holds together and bares repeated listening.
Now we've gotten this far and I don't even know any of their names (they don't list the band members anywhere on the disc although guest musicians and engineers get their due). And so far I've got no clue what the songs are about, although there are a few evocative titles listed in goofy lettering on the back. Hell, I don't even know what these guys look like! When you open the disc there's a photo of five humans, presumably male, I'm guessing, dressed in costumes, that resemble something from the wardrobe of both the Residents and the Mummers - which makes perfect sense as these guys are residents of Philadelphia.
Okay - They've got me. I actually give a shit. My heart, brain and ears are not hard-boiled after all, though I must admit I can barely hear the egg timer these days. I'm gonna track these guys down and find out what they're all about. Maybe they'll even send me a lyric sheet. And I'm hoping it's something of the likes that Lewis Carroll was scribbling on his book cover, lost in a daydream during earth science class.
With all of these comparisons to heroes of yore I must clarify something - these guys don't sound forced. They don't sound like they're "trying."
Comprised of Jesse Moynihan on violin, guitar, and voice, his brother Justin Moynihan on piano, uke, voice, percussionist John Heron, bassist John Pettit who doubles on trumpet and Brandon Beaver - guitar, voice, their music is simply just the way they play it with plenty of imagination, a side of discipline and a dollop of "I don't give a fuck."
"The band formed in the summer of 2002," Jesse said in a brief phone interview. "A lot of inspiration comes from a love of marginalized and misunderstood pop music. I think a foundation or catalyst for the band was when we got into 10CC about three years ago."
You can find Make A Rising and their music HERE.


Fur by John Rocco
(Published in Heaven Books 180 pp $25.00)
The debut novel by New Yorker John Rocco on Louisville's Published in Heaven imprint is a shocking, brash magical realist fable about addiction.
Addictions to dope, sex, violence, money, porn -- it makes no difference to Rocco, a man who seems to have never met a vice he didn't enjoy.
Rocco's book is about addiction and the harshness of modern capitalist society and the inherent shortcomings of sex and the brilliant, unfulfilled promise of American literature. It's also about porn and vampires and zombies and laziness and dissolution. Well, nobody's perfect. Readers are advised that much of this is pornographic in the way that "Naked Lunch" and "Tropic of Cancer" were said to be pornographic. Nowadays that just means "graphic"; realistic to the point of squirm-induction, queasiness, embarrassment.
And his take on the bleeding sore called Manhattan is both funny and accurate: "They tell you that 'Manhattan' means 'Island of the Hills.' All propaganda to sell, sell, sell. The word 'Manhattan' was a corruption of ... the Delaware (Indians') 'Manahachtanienk,' or, 'the place where we all got drunk.' They were talking about their first meetings with the white man and the fire water they drank for the first time. It helped with the negotiations."
John "Johnny Guitar" Foucault is a son of a long line of French trappers and fur traders and thieves and pornographers. He is a gypsy protagonist with the author's own encyclopedic literary knowledge. He steals furs, beds whores, helps with porn productions, sells various drugs and philosophizes about why New York is so screwed up and why, not even the sleaziest women can satisfy him sand why he can't quit drinking and drugging. His attempts to find answers inevitably make things worse until the linear narrative of the book spins off into a sort of magical realism featuring vampires and zombies and cut-up texts stolen
straight from the William S. Burroughs playbook. Rocco "references" or "rips off" more great writers during the course of this novel than anyone else in any other recent book I can recall. A partial list includes: Poe, Kerouac, Zola, Burroughs, Bukowski, Hemingway, Fitzgerald, Philip K. Dick, Dylan, Lou Reed, Shakespeare, Rimbaud, Allen Ginsberg and Jim Morrison. The references veer from homage to allusion to parody to out and out theft.
As the plot careens off the rails, the references come flying by faster and thicker until the story becomes less about the fate of the protagonist and more about how many of the inside jokes the reader "gets." It is thus interesting and fun but somewhat reductive and self-satisfied.
Rocco's book is nevertheless a significant intellectual achievment and a powerhouse of wit, satire, imagination and momentum. Unfortunately, it veers off the track frequently, loses its moorings and ends, not with a bang, but with a whimper.
This piece was first printed in the Louisville Eccentric Observer.




Hollers from the crowd and the band is off again into "Jubilee Stomp." London working that plunger. Coleman deconstructing the tune while drums rumble and roll into a jagged New Orleans march. Matt grabs his tenor and kills Leadbelly's "Dick's Holler" with that good nasty rasp. Blues, slow and deep. London's cheeks bulge. The horns fall in behind him. The blarg/gargle/ flark/burble and splort of Curtis Hasselbring's trombone. The slippery, flippery syrupy slurp of Laster"s black stick. The rhythm suddenly falls off a steep cliff as Coleman holds court with an introspective monologue, stepping out of the shadows like Rod Serling in the Twilight Zone until George Schuller's fat beat barges in, kicking like a Nola stripper's legs as the band, who'd been down on their knees, so the crowd could see Coleman, rise to their feet and the sound explodes from the trumpet, pointed at the ceiling, hitting the kid at the front table downing a Heineken, like a snowball upside his head. The notes run like cold water down the side of his face. That's it they can't take it no more. Out of their seats, they flee before the next number, "Red Man's Blues." London's trumpet talks, stutters.


What's funny to me is that the technically "skillful" canvases seem the driest and least personal. The odd, crude, angular pieces seem to convey a real sense of "being in the moment."



1. To have sexual intercourse with.
2. To take advantage of, betray, or cheat; victimize.
3. Used in the imperative as a signal of angry dismissal.
1. To engage in sexual intercourse.
2. To act wastefully or foolishly.
3. To interfere; meddle. Often used with with.
1. An act of sexual intercourse.
2. A partner in sexual intercourse.
3. A despised person.
4. Used as an intensive: What the fuck did you do that for?
Used to express extreme displeasure.












Here's an interesting quote from celebrated figurative painter Eric Fischl concerning the current gallery system (reprinted from "Hampton Jitney Magazine"): "What has changed over these last decades is the gallery system. Galleries are in transition now because of the art fairs, auction houses, and the internet. Primary dealers are becoming obsolete. Younger artists understand this implicitly and so don't tie themselves down to one dealer. They are generally more entrepreneurial than my generation was.
Also, collectors are driving the art world more now than in the past. They are able to find young artists before dealers and curators find them. In fact, dealers and curators look to collectors to see who they should be paying attention to. That has been a big change.
The downside is that the new collectors don't seem to know or care that much about the history of art and so approach art in much the same manner as they do their business. They look for trends. They try and corner markets. They buy low and sell high. They treat art as a commodity. It is what they know and what they do best. Good for business, bad for art."

.


Here, Bullet
If a body is what you want,
then here is bone and gristle and flesh.
Here is the clavicle-snapped wish,
the aorta's opened valves, the leap
thought makes at the synaptic gap.
Here is the adrenaline rush you crave,
that inexorable flight, that insane puncture
into heat and blood. And I dare you to finish
what you've started. Because here, Bullet,
here is where I complete the word you bring
hissing through the air, here is where I moan
the barrel's cold esophagus, triggering
my tongue's explosives for the rifling I have
inside of me, each twist of the round
spun deeper, because here, Bullet,
here is where the world ends, every time.

>>Purchase at Alice James Books
.


"The Freecycle Network™ is made up of many individual groups across the globe. It's a grassroots movement of people who are giving (& getting) stuff for free in their own towns. Each local group is run by a local volunteer moderator (them's good people). Membership is free."
"The Freecycle Network was started in May 2003 to promote waste reduction in Tucson's downtown and help save desert landscape from being taken over by landfills. The Network provides individuals and non-profits an electronic forum to "recycle" unwanted items. One person's trash can truly be another's treasure!"



Putting Their Names All Over the NewsFor more of this disturbing story, click HERE.
Banks' Sponsorship of Radio Newsrooms Raises Questions About Journalism Ethics
By Steven Levingston
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, December 15, 2005; Page D05
"...Clear Channel Communications Inc. radio stations in Madison, Wis., and Milwaukee are turning back the clock.
Starting in January, the news on WIBA-AM in Madison will deliver its report from the Amcore Bank News Center. The station has sold naming rights to its newsroom to Amcore, a regional institution operating in southern Wisconsin, northern Illinois and Iowa. About two years ago, WISN-AM in Milwaukee introduced listeners to its newscast from the PyraMax Bank News Center.


A snappy little snapshot of local history, Genevieve Coleman's charming first feature, Monday Night at the Rock 'N Bowl chronicles about the punk rock bowlathon-drinkathon at the Diversey River Bowl in Chicago. It's out on DVD now, and we check in with first-time feature filmmaker Genevieve Coleman about its process and progress of a story told over the course of several months of Mondays around the turn-of-the-century with borrowed video cameras.
Monday Night premiered at 2002's Chicago Underground Film Festival, then hit the rocky road of modern-day distribution. "In 2003 we played the Wisconsin Film Fest in Madison, which was really great, and then the San Francisco IndieFest, also very fun. The larger fests were not that interested," the 29-year-old director says.
PRIDE: Why do you think that was?
COLEMAN: We tried, but it is such random taste at festivals, I guess we just weren't what [some of these festivals] were looking for in a documentary. Still, we've sold out almost every screening we have had of the film, including a one-nighter in Los Angeles, and I've gotten emails from all over the country, from people who heard about the film from one of the fests, or friends or whatever, asking where they could buy it. We screened at Docs for Sale in Europe, and had some mild interest from distributors, but nothing panned out. This year I just decided, to hell with it, I would self-distribute. It's going pretty well, and we're talking to a few companies about doing a video release for rentals.PRIDE: When's the first time you heard of or went to the Rock 'N Bowl?
COLEMAN: The summer of 1999, and there were about twenty people there. I met a whole slew of people who are in the doc that very first night. They went on Monday because they all worked in the service industry and everyone had the night off. Oh, I met Julia that first night too, Julia Henner. Julia I would describe her as a tall blond beautiful brilliant goddess who has a knack for getting along with everyone, has been a good friend, knows how to make a killer drink, and is totally fun to hang out with. I don't think I had been bowling in ten years, maybe longer, but that first night pretty much got me hooked, since it was so much fun. I started going every Monday with that same group.PRIDE: When did you realize you should just start shooting?
COLEMAN: About two months later. I was there one night with Michael [Michael Palmerio, editor and co-producer of the film], and we just showed up assuming that the gang would all be there, but no one we knew came out that night, which was really rare. It had started to get a lot busier on Mondays by that point, and it as kind of surreal to look around at all these people with Mohawks and piercings with crazy punk music blaring. They are all like dancing around and singing and having so much fun, and we are in this bowling alley.PRIDE: Bowling wasn't popular then with a crowd like this.
COLEMAN: Yeah, it's funny, because bowling has gotten a lot more popular since then, but at the time, it was just starting to get popular with a younger crowd. There weren't a ton of hipster scenes in bowling alleys yet, so I just thought it was really cool that all these people found a place in common to hang and have a good time, and made it their own. It also reminded of this scene I had in high school, and made me start thinking about all the pictures I have from back then, and how cool it would have been to try and capture that on film.PRIDE: So was it more than home movies from the get-go?
COLEMAN: Well, at first I really wasn't sure what direction it was going to take. I mean, the footage does have a home movie element to it, especially since I was kind of part of the scene I was filming. But I realized after the first night of shooting that I could make something that was bigger than just a documentary of what was happening externally there, that somehow I had started something that would capture the scene from the inside out, from the heart in a way. Why it started in a bowling alley and how bowling had become for a lot of these people a connective thing in itself, along with the music, it seemed really different from most docs I had seen before.PRIDE: There are more docs like this now, but then...
COLEMAN: Yeah, I mean really, when I sat down and watched the first tape I ever shot, from that first Monday, it was amazing how it felt. Because it was capturing the scene as a whole, without trying to focus on one person or one storyline, by just running about with a camera, I was looking at everything at once, and that was pretty true to how the atmosphere was at that time. I think I felt the same way then as I do now about why it was important to capture this.PRIDE: Why?
COLEMAN: It's pretty simple, scenes like that don't last. People grow up, they change, they move, it never stays the same. Sometimes new people take over, but it still never feels the same. And I think most people have experienced that phenomenon at least once and can relate to the feeling of wanting something tangible to go back and look at later that reminds them of old times. I think I also wanted to take this scene and put it on display for the world a little bit, which I assume is often the impetus for documentaries, although I can't say for sure. To show everybody something that you find interesting, something you think it worthwhile for other people to know about because it might contribute to their own sense of things.PRIDE:: How did the fact of increasingly cheaper technology facilitate things?
COLEMAN: First off, we had no money to begin with, no money at all, I mean barely enough to buy a tape that costs ten bucks, so there is no way I could have started shooting if I had been rolling film. But more than that, it would have been really difficult, logistically, to shoot in a place with 36 lanes of bowling going on, loud music, running around non-stop, fluorescent lighting, with a film camera. So the smaller video cameras really made it possible to just roll tape, and don't stop until they lock the doors that night, in an affordable and easily obtainable way, you know, borrowing a camera from friends every Monday. But hey, it worked.

PRIDE: Was post-production difficult? A bowling alley is a loud place. And what about music rights when music's blaring at every moment?COLEMAN: Post was where the real life was brought into this movie. Michael and I worked very closely to shape the it, dividing it into sections to form a structure, and trying to decide what was important to include, and what we didn't think was useful. It was fun and exciting to see how the movie came together and changed as we went along. I mean, I think post is probably the most rewarding part of making a documentary. It has its difficulties too. I mean, we cut it a few years ago, and when we did the online [edit], we used an old version of Final Cut. There were so many more obstacles to what we were doing back then, the technology has come so far, so fast. When I think about how much better everything worked this year, editing and developing content for the DVD, compared to trying to make a movie with essentially the same software five years ago, it's really stunning. But I get a kick out of problem-solving, so I never felt negative about the limitations we had, just excited by the prospect of creating the best movie possible given those limitations.
PRIDE: And the final music?
COLEMAN: We have rights to all the music that we cut sequences to in the movie. In fact, we replaced the last song in the film with a new one for the DVD because the previous band decided they did not want to work with us on the DVD release. Fortunately, Screeching Weasel came through and gave us one of their songs that I love and I think it actually works better than what we had before, so it's all for the best.PRIDE: And now you're self-publishing the DVD.
COLEMAN: As far as getting the film onto DVD, when I first looked into it a couple years ago, the cost was about five times what it is now. Software is cheaper, replicating is cheaper, everything now is being offered at a prosumer level, it makes all of it possible for someone like me, who has not got a huge operating budget, but is now able to produce professional quality movies.

PRIDE: Almost no one's shooting docs on film.
COLEMAN: Don't get me wrong; I would have loved to shoot it with a huge budget, and a ton of cameras, and lots of film, etc. It just wasn't possible, because of money and where I was at the time. In the end I think it was better that we didn't have a lot to work with, it created the look and feel of the film, makes it a smaller and more intimate setting, and I think it has a little of that homegrown-DIY feel, which works for me.PRIDE: Why'd you leave Chicago?
COLEMAN: I left because I wasn't getting work there. I was tired and needed a change of pace. There's a lot more film work out here, and a lot more opportunity to meet people who can help you get films made. I think I considered going to New York, but it was right after 9/11, and a lot of my friends had just moved to the West coast. I think Los Angeles is a sort of natural progression for a lot of people, just because Hollywood is here. And I have to say, I have definitely learned a lot about filmmaking since I got here, and even more about the business of filmmaking, although that part is less fun.PRIDE: Are you eyeing anything like this in LA right now, any social setting that's as interesting to you?
COLEMAN: Huh. That's a tough one. LA has scenes, but they are not so concentrated, and the people are not so interconnected on levels that go beyond superficial schmoozing and general bar familiarity. People here seem to have a hard time finding things and then sticking to them. But certainly some of the music venues, and a couple bars have a vague sense of "scene" in the way it did at the Rock 'N Bowl. I would guess there are some that I haven't found yet. I hope there are!PRIDE: So Chicago is a more social city than Los Angeles?
COLEMAN: It depends on your definition of social. I would never say that people in Los Angeles are not social. I would say there is less of a sense of a community as a city. In Chicago, I always felt like no matter where I went, I was surrounded by this general feeling that Chicago has all to itself, as a city, as a whole. And in Los Angeles, I think you only get back the amount you are willing to put in, if that makes sense. There are some wonderful people here, and some really great places to go and see, but it doesn't have the same presence of mind as Chicago did, and I think the social scenes here feel less connected and somewhat flimsy in comparison. That being said though, there are some real gems here. It actually gets better the longer you live here, because you start to find where the secret places are to go, and avoid all the crap that feeds a relatively obnoxious and boring Hollywood nightlife.PRIDE: Do you know what the scene's like at Diversey River Bowl today?
COLEMAN: I'm not sure what Mondays are like there now. I have heard that they still do it, but that it's changed. My guess is, it's still a lot of fun, but it'll never be what is was before, as is the way with most good things.The Monday Night at the the Rock 'N Bowl DVD is available at Coleman's website as well as at Diversey River Bowl, 2211 West Diversey, (773) 227-5800. More pictures and information are also at the Monday Night Rock "N Bowl MySpace profile.

"We need to talk. I don't know how to say this, except to just say it.... I know it's four days before Christmas and all, but there's no point in going through the motions anymore. This has been a long time coming, and we both know it. Don't worry. It's not you. It's me."
"Well, the truth is, there's somebody else, and they're forcing this decision upon us. We just can't be together anymore. We tried to make it work. You know we did. But this arrangement just isn't right for either one of us... Sometimes even relationships with such great promise don't work out. Now that I think about it, maybe there was no way to please you. And can you honestly say you wanted a newspaper in your life, even if it was designed just for you? ... Oh, please don't cry. I didn't mean that. I did want you, really I did... But we haven't had that kind of excitement in months. That's my fault, too, I guess... I know I'm leaving you, but it's not all my fault. You really didn't pay enough attention to me. I mean, I was there for you the best I could. Five days a week. And did you put in effort to spend time with me? Well, it wasn't enough... Maybe we'll meet again one day and things will be different. Maybe we'll be different... All I know for sure is you're not getting a Christmas present from me." [The channeling from beyond is by columnist Mark J. Konkol.]

Oh What a Slaughter by Larry McMurtry
(Simon and Schuster 179 pp. $25.00)
When Larry McMurtry turns to non-fiction he is as potentially great as any writer in America. When the topic is as near a dear to his heart as the history of How the West was Won, the results can be positively staggering. The author of "Lonesome Dove" and "Terms of Endearment" starts with an overly long introduction -- almost an apology, really, for the grimness of his approaching subject -- and then proceeds to painstakingly document and deconstruct each of the major Indian massacres of the late 1800's. The book refers to Custer's fall at Little Bighorn but has no chapter dedicated to it. It does deal in detail with massacres starting with the Sacramento River massacre and describes every mass killing leading up to and including Wounded Knee. The white man was overwhelmingly the aggressor and many of the body counts were low, but many settlers were indeed scalped and massacred barbarically themselves. McMurtry calls these incidents "perfect meatshops" quoting a long forgotten federal cavalryman; the metaphor of the butcher shop and the slaughterhous are omnipresent.
The cast of characters is impressive and the menu of unprintable attrocities is even more generous. Suffice it to say that every appendage was severed and stuffed into every orifice and every protusion was separated and taken as trophy. Victim's scalps and scrotums were made into tobacco pouches and displayed as staus symbols, OK? Women and children on each side were not spared. It was comparable to Rwanda or the Russian pogroms or the reign of Pol Pot (except for the numbers). It was a rough time.
What counterbalances the almost unrelenting horror of this series of tales is the history and the obvious love of detail McMurtry brings to it; and also the star-studded cast of characters. Here you will learn the actual, documentable history of such quasi-mythical figures as Sitting Bull, George Custer, Crazy Horse, Red Cloud, Kit Carson, Nelson Miles, Geronimo, Chief Joseph, Running Bear, Lewis and Clark Generals Grant and Sheridan, Buffalo Bill Cody and William Tecumseh Sherman (whose actual quote was "the only good Indian I've ever seen was a dead one").
In short, the action is non-stop and the history is well-researched and documented whilst slightly edging the boundary of excessively "academic" writing; it is history
as novel, and as many have done before. But it is vivid and concise and written with the joie de vive only available to a writer who truly loves his subject. No one gets a pass in this history, neither Indian nor European. By the end of the surprisingly thin book there is enough blood on the pages to merit the description "perfect meatshop."



Three new novels in my beloved crime fiction genre have appeared recently and are so good that ignoring them would seem itself to be a criminal offense for anyone interested in these sorts of books. The first (in order of recent publication) is the latest from the great, Emmy-nominated (for HBO's "The Wire") George Pelecanos, "Drama City."(295 pp. $24.95 Little Brown). Strictly speaking, it is not a crime novel but it is certainly hard-boiled.
The two main characters, one male, one female, are an ex-convict dog-catcher and a parole officer, respectively. Lorenzo Brown spends his days keeping cats and dogs from being abused and also trying to keep himself from being dragged back into the drug life he left behind not too long ago. Rachel Lopez, meanwhile, is a hard-working civil servant with a crippling sex addiction and a significant problem with the sauce (specifically bourbon).
As always, Pelecanos' turf remains the meaner-than-mean streets of Washington, DC. This is a city that makes Memphis and Detroit and St. Louis look like Gardens of Eden. There are few or no senators, congressmen, dignitaries or lawyers in Pelecanos' DC; mainly there are drug users, drug dealers, and gunshot victims. Then there are the honest, earnest folks like Alonzo and Rachel who provide Pelecanos' literary raison d'etre and allow him to wear his awesome compassion on his sleeve.
John Burdett is largely unknown in America but it is hard to see how that will remain the case for long. His latest novel -- his
fourth, I think -- is every bit as mind-bogglingly exotic as its predescessors. And, yes, it again takes place in Thailand. "Bangkok Tattoo" (305 pp., $24.00, Knopf) is a sequel to 2003's "Bangkok Eight," but is superior in every way. For those accustomed to the high energy, intellectually heady crime prose of James Ellroy, your newest savior has arrived. Burdett's detective, Sonchai, is a well-drawn, extremely complicated character, an half-Caucasian, half-Thai bastard son of a prostitute, a police detective of flexible reliability and a Buddhist unafraid of violence and deceit. Sonchai is also a man of somewhat indecisive sexuality and a son of unfathomable honor and loyalty. Burdett, for his part, is a confident plotter and an equally comfortable prose stylist. He lived in Hong Kong for a decade working as a lawyer and learned a good deal about Asian culture(s). This trip through the sex-and-dope-based economy of Bangkok (and environs) is at once more plausible and more fantastic than that undertaking in his earlier efforts.
By far the greatest recent find is a murder mystery (the twelfth) written originally in French by a writer named Fred Vargas and concerning a character named Jen Baptiste Adamsberg, a most unlikely protagonist in this genre. He is not macho, not very scientific and seems to rely almost entirely on hunches -- he is something like a French version of lieutenant Columbo with more sex appeal and more beligerence. More interesting is the fact that Fred Vargas is a woman. The book is called "Have Mercy On Us All" (Simon and Schuster, 353 pp. $14.00) and its author has a lot to teach the mystery-writer's/women's-club based here in Kentucky. Although it is a true whodunit, wherein the killer's identity is not revealed until near the end, Vargas' book relies on few gimmicks. And, though it is just as exotic as anything by Burdett, has a grounded feel that seems to steer the reader toward a more realist interpretation.
Maybe because it references the bubonic plague. Something weird is happening in Paris and the papers are all aflutter: People are being killed by plague and are hysterically painting medieval symbols (strange reversed numeral fours) on their doors in order to ward off the disease. Inspector Adamsberg is the John Lennon of detectives; cynical, laid back yet nuerotic, romantic yet callous, fiercely intelligent. The supporting cast is at once realistic and downright bizarre. There is a self-installed town crier, an angry Viking tavern owner, a passel of hurt and plotting would-be femmes fatale and a disgraced professor carrying on as a mental health counselor. Almost all of them are ex-convicts.
This is as good a crime read as anything to come along in some time, so good that evey American contemporary save Pelecanos and perhaps Ellroy should be feeling left in the dust about now. For the last few years Europeans seem to have taken over this genre, usurping a throne built by Poe and Hammet and Chandler. It's high some American crime writers redoubled their efforts.

A UK study shows Barbie's in for it: "The girls we spoke to see Barbie torture as a legitimate play activity, and see the torture as a 'cool' activity," said Agnes Nairn, one of the University of Bath researchers.
"The types of mutilation are varied and creative, and range from removing the hair to decapitation, burning, breaking and even microwaving." Further atrocity at the link. (The illustration comes from this Swiss art site, which offers more of the same.)



Not literally, of course. (And not that there's anything wrong with that.) In today's Sun-Times Anders Smith Lindall offers up a steaming platter of home-town goodness: Jay Ryan of The Bird Machine. Ryan's burgeoning cottage industry designs and prints brilliant original pieces for cd covers and concert posters.

The whimsical nature of those drawings -- they might depict an armadillo on a skateboard, or an astronaut playing baseball or a brawl in which a man's only weapon is a platypus -- have made Ryan's posters instantly recognizable, winning him a wide following among bands who commission his work and fans who collect it.

Read the story Illustrations put face on Chicago rock scene

Until I get better footing with this whole blog thing I'd like to start things off with a passage from Max Beckmann's essay entitled "On My Painting" written in 1938. Beckmann's words have been influential in how I see and work with paint. 
"My way of expressing my Ego is by painting; there are, of course, other means to this end such as literature, philosophy or music; but as a painter, cursed or blessed with a terrible and vital sensuousness, I must look for wisdom with my eyes. I repeat, with my eyes, for nothing could be more ridiculous or irrelevant than a 'philosophical conception' painting purley intellectually without the terrible fury of the senses grasping each visible form of beauty and ugliness. If from those forms which I have found in the visible, literary subjects result - such as portraits, landscapes or recognizable compositions - they have all originated from the senses, in this case from the eyes, and each intellectual subject has been transformed again into form, color and space."
Max Beckmann, "On My Painting," 1938

Local glossy STOP SMILING, "the magazine for high-minded lowlifes," pulls out the stops with an all-Chicago celebration (issue #24) on the stands soon: the cover models are Mayor Daley, Vince Vaughn and Hugh Hefner, collect one, collect them all. The good stuff inside starts with Q&As with local lumens like Lois Weisberg, Aleksandar Hemon, William Friedkin, Studs Terkel...

try to follow the line
that expands throughpacked earth
and spreadsnot to eliminate erosion
but to complicate place
and we hear only voices
through a silent chamber
talking about people
long dead



"There has been a shift in the functions of the various strata in the art work in recent decades. Something far stranger than a power realignment alone has been happening in the art world. Earlier, historical changes were relatively transparent transpositions of domination. Novel now is the seeming shift of interest, of focus --- almost of aesthetic object."





About the Shark, phlegmatical one,
Pale sot of the Maldive sea,
The sleek little pilot-fish, azure and slim,
How alert in attendance be.
From his saw-pit of mouth,
From his charnel of maw,
They have nothing of harm to dread,
But liquidly glide on his ghastly flank
Or before his Gorgonian head;
Or lurk in the port of serrated teeth
In white triple tiers of glittering gates,
And there find a haven when peril's abroad,
And asylum in jaws of the Fates!
They are friends;
and friendly they guide him to prey,
Yet never partake of the treat -
Eyes and brains to the dotard lethargic and dull,
Pale ravener of horrible meat

well, well; here we finally are, ensconced in cool grey green salt water unfettered- now; is there anything to eat in this place? SHARKFORUM I see as an aristocracy, a place where unique, inimitable, individuals can gather to discuss ideas, argue, hold forth and so on. Chomping is not only allowed, but encouraged: are we not APEX PREDATORS?
Though I am confident that this idea will grow and permutate as we develop it, the basic idea to get things started, is an editors circle that will be known as, The Concrete Club- as in the inimitable thinglyness of how things are in terms of the concrete and universal. How subjective is all of this? Try jumping into the water with me (carcharodon carcharias,) and see for yourself just how subjective biological fear can actually be!
Anyway, I digress: what we are going to do is begin with this interdiciplinary discussion group- which will in time begin to focus on site specific events here in Chicago -and elsewhere- that we find interesting and of note - some of these things we hope to eventually have on our site in their cyber incarnation -ideally, functioning as a guide to actual events/ exhibitions. And in this way this site will be experimental -in seeing just what the symbiosis between virtual and actual can mean in the concreteness of the open sea. Rather than introducing the members of our group to you, I will simply let them announce their own presence, on their own terms - I mean this is sharky water after all-
Many are simply gummed by what researchers now believe to be packs of wild sharks and then let go...
Sharks and Media
Media sensationalism and widespread ignorance has given the white shark a bad rap. Although the species is responsible for an average of 2-3 non-fatal attacks on swimmers, surfers, specious venalities posing as curators, manipulative art educators hellbent on self-promotion/promotion of their specific agendas/departments- usually under the auspices of 'new institutional product' -commonly known as 'emerging artists'; mediocre, has been art dealers pretending to be art saviors/museum directors; failed artist with their prerequisite resentments, bolstered with muddled, poorly realized thought; artists whose positions in the artworld here, seems to have more to do with political appointment than any discernible aesthetic sensibility, and divers each year, its role as a menace is exaggerated; more people are killed in the U.S. each year by dogs than have been killed by white sharks in the last 100 years. Additionally, many are simply gummed by what researchers now believe to be packs of wild sharks and then let go........ scientific studies show that population of white sharks is low, with perhaps fewer than 100 adult animals in the state's waters. White sharks are important predators in the marine ecosystems of the California and Lake Michigan coasts, (and elsewhere-) and the people of California (and, Chicago,) recognize that. In 1992, the white shark was placed on the protected species list, and is legally protected from unlawful killing or exploitation. The original bill was supported by both scientists, artists and fishing and arts organizations, surfing clubs and diving groups, private citizens and an array of others. With your support and respect, we can continue to live with this complex and misunderstood animal.
We here at SHARKFORUM are always in search of great web sites. Here are a few faves.
Boing Boing
The Huffington Post
T Shirt Hell
Chickenhead
Show and Tell Music
Fact Check
ad busters
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
Ray Pride: Photographer
Nancy Bockoven's artandletter
David Roth's band the issues

In a world loaded with snarky one-liners, perfunctory didacticisms and quixotic Post-Modernism, Martin Puryear is a breath of fresh air. Last Saturday the 64-year-old artist opened an exhibit of sculpture and drawings at Chicago's Donald Young Gallery, and this is a wonderful, if modest show.
Puryear's work is both sophisticated and playful, featuring organic forms which are oddly humanistic. As with all great sculptors he clearly devotes a great deal of attention to scale, incorporating the anticipated viewer into the design of his pieces.
Puryear's use of craft is authoritative, but this skill never overpowers the metaphorical quality of his work. In fact the beauty of this work is that the choice of materials, method of application and joinery all contribute to a greater gestalt. A knowledge of Scandinavian woodworking and furniture design is evident in the joinery of these pieces (the artist studied at the Swedish Royal Academy of Art, Stockholm, Sweden from 1964 - 68), but all of these pieces are invested with a playfulness which comes across to young audiences as well as old.
As my 6-year-old son moved around "Untitled" (picture above) he was enthralled by the organic qualities of the piece. "It looks a little like a giraffe mixed with a Rhino!" he informed us. And I can't help thinking that such associations are not entirely unintentional. This may be just one form of success, but it's very powerful - such connections, made in the mind of the viewer, creates a wonderful connection between artist, art and patron.
What strikes me as so masterful about this work is the way in which all the elements of form serve to support the final piece. It would be easy for an artist with this level of technical mastery to fall into the redundancy of mannerism, but each of these pieces is unique in it's own way. As an art student I struggled with style, and quickly adopted a rant against those who rely on stylist concerns above all else. In many ways I still feel as strongly about it, and a show such as this is a reminder why. Too often we see high-stylists with tremendous skills go to great lengths to cover for the fact that they are bereft of good ideas. In so many ways American contemporary culture celebrates style over substance, and the art world is not immune from such myopia.
But really great artists find ways to balance all of the formal concerns - content, meaning, style, material, scale, color, hue, value, contrast, and so on. And really great art demonstrates the inter-connection of all things. It is this sense of connection, along with the conflation of the literal and the abstract, which makes Puryear's work so very powerful. This work is strangely both global and American at the same time, as the technique references the woodworking traditions of both Scandinavia and the Orient. And yet the subject matter and boldness of presentation seem somehow uniquely American. The work is by turns pensive, boisterous, contemplative and robust. Both sophisticated and approachable, it's not quite populist and not quite aristocratic.
And I can't help wondering what he's working on now, as his next big show, at MoMA in NYC quickly approaches. I only wish this show had been larger.
What's in a name? A lot, sez us here at SHARKFORUM, so we'd encourage you to avoid the temptation to read in too much specific meaning.
The broad brush strokes go like this: SHARKFORUM is a news and culture site. Our editorial group represents experience and deep interest in visual art, music, literature, film, and media for starters.
Our purpose is pretty straight-forward: esthetic opinon with well-defined edges. Feel free to disagree, but you're unlikely to suffer any confusion as to where we stand.



