youshouldknow.gif
bblogo4.gif

Websters.gif

jkruthtolive.JPG
enginelogo.gif
eclectic_268.gif

sharkfunniesButton.gif

architrouve.gif

AlGoreButton.jpg

basbadge.gif



art

Child Star Makes Good
by Marilyn Cvitanic

Friday Night Fever
by James Beckman


biz niz

Dandelion Whine
by Rick Rizzo


comic art


film

Sundance Dispatch
by Ray Pride

Until The Monkey Lives
by Marilyn Cvitanic


design


humor

zoophiliacs
by Wesley Kimler

American Totems
by John Kruth


lit

somnophilia, n.
by Simone Muench


local color

The Tree
by Ray Pride

Guided by Sharks
by Wesley Kimler

American Totems
by John Kruth

Hokusai
by Ray Pride


music

Letters From The Earth
by David Amram


original fiction

Banks
by Paul K


people

American Totems
by John Kruth


photo blogging

Another Platform
by david roth

The Tree
by Ray Pride


photography

Escaping Sundance
by Ray Pride

Shots in the Dark
by Andrea Bauer


politics


sensible ideas


social ills


sport

You So Ugly...
by Rick Rizzo


the media


theatre


web gems


word of the day

chiffonier, n.
by Simone Muench

caparison, n.
by Simone Muench

catheterophila, n.
by Simone Muench

hybristophilia, n.
by Simone Muench

tmesis, n.
by Simone Muench

« December 2005 | | February 2006 »

January 31, 2006

Escaping Sundance

1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg1.jpg 1.jpg

1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg

1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg 1.jpg





Sundance Class of 96.jpg
PACKING FOR SUNDANCE each year, I tote along a valuable guidebook about the history of the Sundance Festival's hometown, called "Park City Underfoot." I leave it on the coffee table of the condo, and no one ever consults it. The first draft of history is more urgent. Who needs backstory when there's a hailstorm of privileged moments. Still, there's a wealth of backstory in this mining town, not limited to the past 25 years of the festival or the last decade or so of exurban sprawl. Whenever I pass this cemetery on the edge of town, which is largely populated by children, I think of the movies and hopes and careers that have been interred at festivals past: call this portrait "Sundance Class of '96."



Joseph Smith's wilderness.jpg
Joseph Smith's wilderness is easier to escape than it once was, especially on Sunday morning on the way to the Salt Lake City airport (SLC, tagged on luggage parked in foyers, mud rooms and basements nationwide).



Escape from Park City (by Town Car).jpg
And it's especially easy if you're being ferried by Town Car.



After FLANNEL PAJAMAS.jpg
The largest venue, The Eccles, is also a high school auditorium. You can't smoke and you can't see the racier movies there.



Critical consensus.jpg
The packs thin toward the last several days of the festival. Still, writers and reviewers gather in flocks to fashion consensus.



Hollywood Life House (after).jpg
The swag shacks up and down Main Street are shuttered, the freshly stenciled logos freshly scraped off, such as Hollywood Life(less) House.



Outside Hospitality.jpg
Lush, fluffy snow fell for a few hours on Saturday, as this view from inside the press office's hospitality suite.



In the cowboy seat.jpg
But inside hospitality, interviews still. I have no idea who's parked in the Cowboy Seat.



Distribution seminar.jpg
A presentation for alternative distribution for Slamdance 2005's Four Eyed Monsters, with an evangelist from GenArts and a camerawoman in chiarascuro.



Quick draw.jpg
Earlier, I saw a satisfying composition of a newshen and her camerabear against the backdrop of the nearby hills, but didn't catch them in time: quickly, he turned his bright light on my oh-just-taking-shots-of-the-sky-doh! act.



Barricade.jpg
If Hollywood is a place where you can die of encouragement, is Park City where you can languish from detours?



No.jpg
Or to die from a simple YOU DO NOT BELONG HERE?



Flag.jpg
Utah's not another country: the Burger King stars-'n'-stripes droop and drape here as well.



Terrence Howard presents.jpg
From the multiple screens of the "anterior" press tent during the closing night awards, Terrence Howard (not yet Oscar-nominated) is natty, speaking fluent Howardese.



Miguel Arteta's ice cream.jpg
And Chuck & Buck director and juror Miguel Arteta wears a goofy t-shirt and goofier grin.



Closing night (not)rave.jpg
In the din of the underpopulated after-party, critical colleague Robert Koehler and I are shouting about So Yong Kim's prize-winning mood gem In Between Days and move on to Claire Denis' L'intrus and Hou Hsiao-hsien's underrated mood piece, Millennium Mambo, when a quartet of women schooled in twirling light up one of the party's favors, streaking Hou-like neon colors across the drab confines of the tent.



bedlam is dreaming of rain.jpg
Outside, across the hills, into the sky, the night is timeless.



More photos here.

January 30, 2006

Simone Muench's Poem of the Week: "Because" by Yerra Sugarman

formsofgone.gif


Yerra Sugarman was born in Toronto and teaches writing at New York University and City College. She received the 2005 PEN/Joyce Osterweil Award for Poetry for her first collection, Forms of Gone, published by Sheep Meadow Press in 2002. Her poems and articles have appeared in ACM, The Nation, How2, Pleiades, Barrow Street, Verse Daily, 100 Poets Against the War, and the Oxford Encyclopedia of American Literature. She holds degrees in visual arts from Columbia and Concordia Universities and in writing from City College.

Because
There were days the color of numbers, of runny ink
marks on the arms, the color of iris and storm,
of cattle brand. When I was small,

I thought some people come numbered.
There was the silent ticking of stars, their clear
constant trails, memories floating up from nowhere:

Gedenkst du? Remember? He was a socialist
before the war. Gey shoyn. Go on
…There were stories
from the Torah, a Sabbath candelabra (the one thing saved).

Why? Because our minds are like planted fields.
Candy dishes of crystal, rose and blue, bone china,
a bad painting of the Champs Élysées (purchased with care)

the people in it just a few quick brushstrokes. Kosher
bakery cookies, tea served in glass cups, its darkness lightened
by wheels of lemon. There were the swirling rhythms

of the Bible. When you pray you should move
your lips. Why? Because God must hear
each word. You should shuckle back and forth,

sway. Why? Because the spirit of man
is a candle.
There was the rush to Yizkor services
when children were hushed and filed out of the sanctuary.

Why? Because the dead are asked to intercede.
Early cherry blossoms pawed the suburban fences.
Crocuses speared through late snow where we found ghost

boot-holes, paths that made you know
someone had lived before and now you were taking
their place. The voices of my parents and their friends

hard as iron, soft as pulp. The languages
they spoke pellets of hail against a window.
I met him in the camp, in lager.

Prosze Pani, please Madam, take more cake.
Bardzo ladny. Very good.
He looked like a Pole, that’s how he survived.

Beautiful dress! To jest piekna, Pani Regina. Sheyn.
She ran from one hiding place to another. That’s why she’s so nervous.
Dziekuje bardzo. A sheyem dank. Thank you very much
.

What I still don’t understand—the simultaneity:
beauty fringing horror, the everyday
lined like a coat with the fabric of the extraordinary. A glitter

of lakes, the plush of trees alongside the route of freight trains
from Drancy to Auschwitz. On Deportation Convoy 23,
there was a girl with my name, my name exactly,

just another language. Convoy, I look up
the meaning: To accompany on the way
for protection. A protecting force
. There were skies

opalescent as the insides of oyster shells, clouds
like schools of newly hatched fish.
Some of the children were listed only by number. Why?

Because the infants were too young
to say their names.
Why? Because there was light
reaching through the ribs of the library chairs.

Because there was light.


By Yerra Sugarman from her book Forms of Gone
Purchase at Sheep Meadow Press.

Joel Dorn's NYC: Volume 5
















































January 28, 2006

Spectacle: Notes for a Tasmanian Speech

"In spectacle, narrative may play a part, conflict may be an appendage, but spectacle’s heart is transformation, and its food is poetry."

Great to be here.
Hobart is a vital place.
Flattered by the invite.
Dream Masons is important not only for what it will do for Hobart…. but it creates an international team of artists, furthering a relatively unexplored form.
Was once very reflective, recently have been working very quickly.
Not a part of an international dialogue about spectacle, but generating locally.
I have toured, but not with the spectacle work.
I think we have a chance to do something special for Hobart, for Tasmania, and really for the form of spectacle itself…

I don’t make theater. I studied theater, was interested in theater, fell in love with theater in fact. But we’ve split. I still see theater and sometimes even enjoy it. We get along, theater and I, but it’s best if we don’t spend too much time together. In Chicago, my company is called Redmoon Theater, and over the couple of years I have begun to set in place the momentum to drop the name ‘theater’ from the title. Not because I’m bitter, but because I believe it to be inaccurate.

I consider myself a spectacle maker. Some would say ‘spectacle theater’ and I can’t argue with the logic of that, but it still seems a bit misleading. Spectacle operates according to an entirely different set of rules than theater. It uses the same tools, but makes a different product.

Theater’s dramaturgy is concerned with conflict.

In acting school actors are instructed to find their characters’ conflict. Each moment is to be viewed in consideration of that conflict. I want to talk to Judge Brock, because he can help me escape the sexist oppression of sexist 19th century Holland, but decorum demands that I not accept his invitation. I want to kill Darth Vader because he is evil and looking to control the universe, but he’s my father.

Likewise directors are encouraged to chart the rise and fall of the tension created by the play’s central narrative conflict. The top of Act 3 of The Seagull, while they reminisce about the past, Arkadina wraps Kostya’s head in a bandage after his unsuccessful suicide attempt. The conflict tension is low. Nina rushes back on and tells Trigorin secretly that she, too, is going to Moscow… the tension spikes. Luke and Han Solo flirt with Leia while they admire the craftsmanship on Luke’s new hand, recently cut off by the Darth… the conflict has receded for the moment. Luke hangs over a railing, dangling by one hand, while his nemesis Darth Vader stands above him, sword in hand, saying that he is his father? That’s right. Conflict tension is high.

The traditional drama is thus adversarial. It is this against this. It’s Hobbit Frodo against the Dark Lord whatever his name is. And it must, therefore, be developed and solved according to a rational logic. Frodo must climb to the top of Mordor and dispose of the ring. In his way are: orcs and canyons and snow covered mountains and dragons and huge spiders and volcanic walls and, most ominously, the evil eye of the temptation of power. The script is navigated according to discernable reasoning. How each battle is won or lost makes rational sense. That Hedda suicides because she perceives she can’t get out, it takes 5 acts to prove.

Spectacle is,… well,… not. There is no proof in spectacle and while there may be conflict it is not the heart, but a distant appendage. In spectacle, narrative may play a part, conflict may be an appendage, but spectacle’s heart is transformation, and its food is poetry. It is not an inherently dramatic form. It’s a poetic form. It’s not a plot driven form, though it may have plot elements, but a lyrically driven form. Spectacle is more like music or dance or painting.

At the heart of spectacle is transformation. It depicts, conveys, communicates, and enacts the surprising act of something, anything at all, and sometimes many things, changing their apparent essence from one thing to another. Transformation is the caterpillar to the butterfly; it’s the acorn to the tree. The caterpillar appears, by any account, a glorified worm, a complete creature, but it reveals itself to be quite different from what we would otherwise have thought, seen or surmised. It reveals itself not a fixed entity, as it appears, but in a state of flux, a creature of unforeseen potential, it is a transitory being on its way to fulfillment as a beautiful, delicate butterfly.

Can you think of a more poignant and timely story? The underlying story of every episode of transformation is that we can be other than we are, that we might, at this very moment, actually be something other than what we are. Or, better still, each transformation tells us that those around us may be most unexpectedly en route to their own fulfillment. That even our most critical and rigorous judgments may be misleading.

Transformation reveals an unexpected truth behind our assumptions. It asks us to look again, to think more deeply, to continue the search for beauty even in the face of the ugliness. Transformation is the antidote to cynicism because it demonstrates the endless potential of things to be different than they are, to reveal themselves as having been all the time different than what we thought they were. When a caterpillar chews its way out of a chrysalis, to reveal itself a butterfly, it challenges to look past our limited vision, to consider a secret wonder and potential, beyond our immediate apprehension. A butterfly’s wings beat a rhythm of hope and beauty and endless potential. Transformation leads to illumination.

A few notes about spectacle for further exploration some other time: Transformation encourages us to look at the world with child-like eyes. That is to say, to look at the world with hope and a sense of possibility. That’s not to say, and this is important, that spectacle is relentlessly, intolerably, positive. It can and should still traffic in the dark and the depressing, even the tragically political. In fact, because it is an imagistic form, it has license to explore themes that other populist forms are forced to avoid. Spectacle is the un-sanitized fairy tale, the pre-Disney fairy tale where young girls dance their feet into bloody stumps and children throw witches into ovens.

It is for this that I now love spectacle. It is, without being dogmatic or preachy or didactic, always a message of hope.

Here’s the problem, though, Spectacle is almost impossible, or good spectacle is. Because we want it to be free, or accessible to everyone regardless of class, it makes no money; and because it is generally grand in vision, in cast and in scale, it costs a lot. Because one of the aspects of it is to draw people to generally overlooked public spaces, it is difficult to use exposure to leverage sponsor dollars. Because it is a collaborative form at every level, it requires a community to create. Because it works in public space, it requires a community to produce.

With Redmoon I have sought to make spectacle in many forms. The most exciting form to me, but also the most difficult to pull off, is the transformation of public space. Using theatrical tools, mostly old and neglected theatrical tools like pageantry and puppetry and effigies, and acrobatics, and live music, and broad physical commedia dell’arte like performances, using these old tools we try to alter the very nature of a public space.

Spectacle transforms public space… both the site itself and the community around it. Gathering people together, forging a common experience amongst disparate people, is a means of adding a common denominator to their lives. Spectacle creates, in the moment of its presentation, a living link between people, and its legacy is that experience. Movies are a conversational crutch because they are a shared experience. When the conversation dies we turn to movies as to feed the dying link. Isn’t it time for a more dynamic food?

Movies have taken the place of the circus and storytelling and mythmaking and pageantry. They taken the magic out of our hands and estranged it from us. It’s now an inscrutable commodity made by massive corporations. Movies come down from the stars. Spectacle grows up from the earth. It is made from refuse, resourcefulness and craft. It is made by people staring at ugliness in the face and believing that beauty may still be a single act away.

Shots in the Dark


campgay_smoke






chicagot






couch2






dirtyboys






dontstopbelievin






eleanormegclowns






girls@boygeorgesoundbar.jpg






groupdance






hug_loft_party.jpg






January 26, 2006

The Enigma of the 5th Beatle


It’s late… around four AM and I can’t sleep. The pug is snoring like a frickin’ lawn mower while the cat yowls in the other room, sitting shiva for my sweetheart who’s gone to LA for the week. So what does one do at a time like this?

Drink? Thanks, I’ve already got a glass of brandy. Lie in the dark and sort out the dirty laundry of the past? Nah… There’s no percentage in it. Count sheep? Yeah, right… Perhaps a brief meditation on the Beatles and the enigma of the fifth member that seemed to be always standing in the shadows wielding power and influence. That ought to put some of us to sleep…

It seemed like the Fab Four were always searching for their missing fifth wheel. Beginning with Stu Sutcliffe who actually played the role for a short time as the original bassist for The Silver Beatles as they were known in the days before they became “Fab.” Stu was John’s drinking buddy and showed great artistic promise but had very little, if any musical ability. But with his clip-on shades Sutcliffe was the embodiment of James Dean hip. He was so poor he burned his furniture one winter to keep warm while living in a paint-splattered garret in Hamburg. How Bohemian is that?! Stu originally suggested the name The Beetles inspired by Buddy Holly and the Crickets - which Lennon then oh so cleverly changed into The Beatles. Beaten to a pulp by a rival gang of Teddy Boys Sutcliffe would have been dead if John hadn’t pulled him from the fray. And don’t forget it was Astrid Kirchner, Stu’s beautiful leather-clad German photographer fraulein from their wild days on the Hamburg Reeperbahn gave the lads the famous hair-do.

Enter Brian Epstein - the Cavern, Liverpool, November 1961 – the record store manager/impresario from the North Country with an ear for pop and an eye for the boys in the tight trousers. Brian cleaned up the lads’ image, dressed them like a new breed of bankers and coached them on how to bow. No matter how fruity their flower-power threads got, Brian, to his credit, stuck to his hand-tailored suits and Father Knows Best image. If the pills hadn’t done him in, Two Virgins would’ve done the trick.

Next we have McCartney’s “grandfather” - Wilfrid Brambell, the “very clean” old gent in A Hard Day’s Night. Although Paul was supposedly looking after him, the wrinkly old codger sneaks off to carouse and play cards. With Brambell as their mascot the Fab’s cuteness jumped yet another notch (as if that was possible). After all, what shenanigans can take place with an old man around as escort? A little hand- holding, maybe a rum and coke or two and smoking a couple of fags...

Then came Murray The K – The New York disc jockey from 10.10 AM WINS (The Good Guys) who billed himself as “The Fifth Beatle” while fueling the pandemonium of Beatlemania in the states. Lennon later revealed that “The Fifth Beatle” actually was “Muffy the Cow.”



Magic Alex (AKA John Alexis Mardas) – the synthesizer wizard who traveled with the Beatles to Greece when they were searching to buy their paradise island - Leslo. The liner notes to Magical Mystery Tour begins something like – “Long ago there were four or five magicians” – a friendly nod to Magic Alex who was the leading candidate at the time.

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi – After Brian Epstein died the boys no longer had their father figure. Who better than the giggling guru of transcendental meditation? But after a short trip to the ashram John realized he could grow his own beard and hair down to his ass, dress in white and become his own messianic figure (see the cover of Abbey Road). He no longer needed “Sexy Sadie” to show him the way.

Yoko Ono – John’s collaborator after McCartney. They could get naked together, don pajamas and protest the war, make goofy conceptual art, take heroin, do primal scream therapy and have sex. Later Paulie…

Billy Preston – a little bit of Fender Rhodes gospel kept the Fabs together for one last go ‘round. Maybe they had to behave themselves a bit with a guest in the studio. Thankfully Billy stuck around long enough to lay down the funk on a couple of George and John’s solo projects.

George Martin – Let’s give the man his props. If anyone deserves the title of “The 5th Beatle” it is truly Sir George. From his Elizabethan piano solo on “In My Life” to gently stirring the psychedelic soup of “Tomorrow Never Knows,” we should all have been so lucky to have this guy at the board.

Let us not forget Mal Evans, the band’s roadie who helped McCartney write “I’m Fixing A Hole” and “Magical Mystery Tour” among others.

Now if you wanna get weird there’s crazy ol’ Charlie Manson who had a person to person call wired to his brain from McCartney via “Helter Skelter,” telling him to kill the Beach Boys.

Then there’s Bernard Purdie, the seasoned session drummer who claims to have filled in for Ringo on just about every song since “Love Me Do.”

And don’t be dumb, Pete Best was the fourth Beatle until the lads conspired to replace him with the guy with the big nose and all them rings who was actually the sixth Beatle who (after Stu died and Best was booted) became the fourth Beatle.

Which now brings us to Sir Richard Starkey crooning the gentle lullaby “Goodnight, sleep tight…” from der White Album.

Child Star Makes Good

At best, self-revelation creates legends. We can’t get enough of Frida Kahlo. The Mexican born artist who died over 50 years ago is a bona fide pop icon. At worst, confessional art tells us more than we want to know about it’s subject and is both boring and embarrassing.

Gad/Page/Madonna

Gad/Page/Madonna, 12"x24", 2005

Fortunately Simone Gad’s autobiographical work falls much closer to the former category than the latter. She’s a master of the pop culture iconography that we associate with her native Hollywood. Most of her collages contain a headshot of Gad (an established character actor as well as visual artist), soft-core porn photos (I’m guessing these date back to the 50s or 60s) and some sort of kitschy Christian image, often a Madonna. To assume that Gad’s intent is to simply illustrate her own Madonna/whore identity crisis is to oversimplify her work. The headshots, some going from the 60s and Simone’s early teens, are juxtaposed with the other images to reflect Gad’s topsy-turvy take on life in Hollywood. Her path is anything but linear and her compositions imply a range of emotions including the idealism of a young actress to an experienced woman’s feigned shock at the state of her world.

Gad’s collages aren’t all lighthearted fun even though the reoccurring female trio featuring the earnest struggling actress, the porn star with super-sized breasts and the Virgin Mary is undeniably funny. The daughter of holocaust survivors, she entered the Hollywood fray in her early teens only to audition, against all odds, for the girl-next-door roles that usually went to a Doris Day type blonde or brunette ala Annette Funicello. Simone reminds us of her Jewish roots by including the occasional a sketch of a dredel or Star of David. These sketches are small and one must look closely to see them, perhaps implying that her family, like many other post WWII immigrants, strove towards cultural assimilation at the expense of their Jewish/European heritage. Gad’s quick, tense brush strokes and scrawled text also hint at her own personal conflicts, providing an intriguing counter weight to the goofy kitsch that she is so good at.

gad10.jpg

Knokke/Gad, 12"x24", 2005

The exhibition also includes Gad’s paintings of buildings, primarily the old Victorian homes near downtown LA and the smaller 1920’s bungalows that are emblematic of early and mid 20th Century Hollywood. At first glance these paintings are surprising, almost out-of-place. Gad has devoted most of her career to pop-oriented, autobiographical collage and assemblage. That’s what we expect from her. However, these paintings deserve their place on the gallery walls. Gad paints in an impasto style with bright colors and strong lines that complement her collages. The buildings are recognizable for what they are, specific structures as well as survivors of a long-gone and idealized Hollywood, the birthplace of the pop icon that Simone Gad understands so well.

Online preview of exhibition: here. More of Simone’s work here.

Simone Gad: Recent Work

New Painting, Assemblage, Collage
L2Kontemporary
990 N. Hill Street #205
LA, CA 90012
January 7 - February 4, 2006

January 25, 2006

Sundance Dispatch





THIN WHAT








The Troma Marching Band








The making of content








VS








Rose's uploading is done








Shuttle stop








Not yet served








Main Street XPress








Main Street








No... Anytime








Not Yet Rated








Library








Itched








Lost Friends








Heber & Swede








FILM








Ebert discourses on Wodehouse








Condo by Night








C5








Below the lift








Liz Phair








Behind Main Street








M. Doughty








Behind Dolly's bookstore





More photos here.

January 23, 2006

What's Wrong with Art Criticism?

bound.jpg Nancy Princenthal's Art in America article on the crisis in art criticism is a must-read!

There is a current crisis not only in art itself --- and the curating of art --- but in art criticism as well. New York Times book editor Barry Gewen reflected upon the theme last month in his long, elucidating essay, "State of the Art." Nancy Princenthal contributes a wonderful, barbed-yet-not-vicious article on the subject in the current issue of Art in America (January 2006, pp. 43-47). The title of her article is "Art Criticism, Bound to Fail; A critic confronts the inescapable limitations of writing about art and reflects on its pitfalls and privileges." This essay will be a part of the upcoming anthology Critical Mess: Art Critics on the State of Their Practice edited by another great art critic (and a poet), Raphael Rubinstein.

This is a "must read" article. I won't summarize it here, just encourage everyone to go read it! If only we could get such cogent self-analysis out of curators and other pundits, to say nothing of we artists and "hot" galleries.

chiffonier, n.

chiffonier.gif
chiffonier, n.
A narrow high chest of drawers or bureau, often with a mirror attached.

“One day I found that the drawer at the bottom of the chiffonier, replete with mothballs, was filled with shawls, white, green, lilac. Stacked amid a great smell of camphor--it was like a shop; I didn’t have the nerve to ask her what she planned to do with them. ”

--Julio Cortazar, “House Taken Over”

From House Taken Over



simonelSM.jpg More Blogs by Simone Muench | EMail Simone


Simone Muench's Poem of the Week: “Leave the Gun. Take the Cannoli." by Ray Bianchi

ray-cov-sm.jpg


Ray Bianchi is a native of suburban Chicago, the child of Italian immigrants, educated at the University of Iowa. Ray lived and worked for most of the 1990s in Bolivia and Brazil, first as a volunteer in a men's prison and later in international publishing. His work has appeared in Tin Lustre Mobile, Moria, Poesia Y Cultura, and Afterwords. Ray is the author of Circular Descent which is available from Blaze VOX Press. He is the author of two blogs chicagopostmodernpoetry and collagepoetchicago.

“Leave the Gun. Take the Cannoli.”
The pungency of those men who use bear
grease to keep their hair down while discussing
the Bel Canto. On that Saturday afternoon,
breasts were heaving and Comiskey Park green
was in my nose and cigarettes burned the vinyl
chairs. Hordes of monsters, offering plates of
food to garden statues next to faux
ponds. . . While talking and listening to Offenbach,
I think “fuck art, let’s dance.” I make a full
lunch of an Italian Beef Sandwich with nice
sport peppers and a really wet bun and date
stamping. G-string bikinis and a great piece of
steak, rare and bloody, give me indigestion and
a need for tea. The stripper’s smell is in my
nose and the roof is leaking yellow National
Geographics.


By Ray Bianchi.
Purchase at Blaze VOX.

January 22, 2006

caparison, n.

caparison.gif
caparison, n.
1. An ornamental covering for a horse or for its saddle or harness; trappings.
2. Richly ornamented clothing; finery.

tr.v. caparisoned, caparisoning, caparisons
1. To outfit (a horse) with an ornamental covering.
2. To dress (another) in rich clothing.


To the alcove of your tears
to your silken foot there the might of weapons far away
to my Spanish jennet
caparisoned with nerines with black stars with freesias.

--Valentine Penrose, “Beloved to love you,” trans. Mary Ann Caws

From Surrealist Love Poems



simonelSM.jpg More Blogs by Simone Muench | EMail Simone


January 20, 2006

What's Wrong With the Art World?

featurebadge.gif
"Trash," according to Sabine Folie, chief curator at the Kunsthalle in Vienna, "has become a transcendental necessity." Folie, about whom I know nothing other than her absolutely perfect name, is writing in the catalogue of "'Dear Painter, Paint me...,'" an exhibition that recently toured Europe and included work by John Currin, the fly speck of a painter who has been stuck in many a New Yorker's eye since his mid-career retrospective opened at the Whitney Museum in November.
In a rational world, Currin's mousy imitations of old-master portrait styles would not earn him a freelance gig as a magazine illustrator, but we are living in a very different kind of world, where Currin and his ilk are showcased at the Pompidou Center in Paris, accompanied by an essay of Folie's titled "Meta-Trash," in which she observes that "there can no longer be any painting without trash." She hastens to add that "This observation does not exclude seriousness of intent.... The more everyday 'trash' invades and contaminates our pictorial worlds, the greater is the potential for the 'magical' quality of a work to emerge." I would take the lunacy of Folie's argument for a parody in a novel about the contemporary art world, except that this winter some version of Folie's turgid mix of hipster metaphysics and academic aggression has been circulating in just about every corner of Manhattan where people are talking about the paintings of John Currin.

Currin is a symptom. He reflects the cracked values of an art world where most of the people in charge no longer know what gives a work of art life. The unease or confusion that greets Currin's portraits of suburban matrons and young cuties and gay couples, which are larded with allusions to old master paintings and pop culture, is said to mark the emergence of a freshly off-kilter sensibility. Currin's lounge-lizard gambits are hailed for giving classical values a modern ironic twist. Robert Rosenblum and Peter Schjeldahl, writers so suave that they pass as something other than the connoisseurs of fashion that they are, marshal all their formidable erudition and literary ingenuity to make the case for Currin as a major player in the art historical games. In the catalogue of the Whitney show--which was organized by the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago and the Serpentine Gallery in London--Rosenblum announces that "Currin knows his old masters inside out," and tells us how much he enjoyed touring the Metropolitan's permanent collection with the artist. Last year Currin himself curated a selection of masterworks at the Boston Museum of Fine Arts, thereby proving that he likes Velázquez as much as the next guy. Currin certainly knows how to spritz ideas. He's got a line on everything, from photographs of models in Cosmopolitan to Cranach's Venuses and Eves. He dabbles with misogyny, but slyly, so that it registers as nouveau masculinity. And of course this pleases the guys in Tribeca, with their fashion-model girlfriends and steak dinners and cigars, among whom there might be somebody with the half-a-million bucks that you now need to buy one of Currin's paintings.


His admirers read the limpness of his work as a new brand of world-weary sophistication. I think the paintings are merely ill-focused. Whatever the knowingness of his allusions, classical structure and modern skepticism are for Currin not grand principles to be grappled with, but intellectual accessories, attitudes to be tried on for size like the latest rags from Jeffrey's. As a dissent from modernism Currin is a joke. The critique of modernism's rage for purity, which is as old as modernism itself, requires a gravitas that is beyond the reach of this prime-time buffoon. Currin's oft-admired "technique"--he is said to paint fur and hair especially well--would not have earned him an entry-level job in a painter's workshop three hundred years ago. Many of the poverty-stricken girls who painted flowers on porcelain plates in nineteenth-century French factories were more talented than he is. He is merely the latest sharpie to make a killing with the sodden heap of gimmicks that Eric Fischl and David Salle used to bulldoze their way to SoHo stardom in the early 1980s. His work is toxic--art pollution."

From "Beyond Belief" by Jed Perl. Originally printed in The New Republic

When some time ago the subject of John Currin as a painter was broached, I suggested the article Beyond Belief which can be found on The New Republic site – or, in its entirety here - after further consideration, it seems to me that more interesting than wasting any energy discussing “this flyspeck of a painter,” would be to begin a discussion on why SHARKFORUM has come into being, and how it is that all of you are here, without being eaten alive! (not that being eaten alive is necessarily a bad thing)

I'm wanting to talk about two sentences from the above:
“Currin is a symptom. He reflects the cracked values of an art world where most of the people in charge no longer know what gives a work of art life.”
And let me add to this with - and I want you all to consider this - how have we come to a place where so many of the painters who are touted as being ‘important' are so flat out bad? I mean bad at this thing called painting – as in creating drama via simple and sheer plastic invention on a canvas? Every time I hear someone like Luc Tuymans (who by the way is a completely lovely man) talk about Julian Schnabel’s bullshit I just have to laugh. At least as a painter Julian on occasion actually takes chances and tries to do interesting things with the actual language of paint. You know that stuff that’s kind of oily and has pigment in it (or as Perl noted, “the hellbent fury of oil paint.") Maybe I just don’t get it, but it looks to me like Luc (or Elizabeth Peyton, with her amazingly mediocre, student level, illustrative confections depicting somewhat recognizable rock stars at up to $600,000.00 a piece) all done to the accompaniment of a chorus of cooing critics - that these people as painters, along with Currin and company, all kind of suck. So for me, the question is, how did they get to where they are? If they're so good, who says so?

Let me rephrase – and if you get nothing else from what I’m saying here, ask yourself one question: just how did we get from the heady, tumultuous and yet halcyon days of High Modernism, when "what is painting- and what painting is, the ‘thing’ itself, in all of its raging thinglyness, welling up," was being so brilliantly addressed, recapitulated via works like Pollock’s Autumn Rhythm, or de Kooning’s Easter Monday or Excavation, or Woman One, or Door To The River... how did we get from work of this ontological magnitude and artists of this kind of towering integrity and grit to say, Currin’s painting ‘Snow-bo,’ a painting that is nothing if not a second rate Norman Rockwell-esque piece of trite cutesy-pie smut that looks not unlike a poorly rendered Hallmark Christmas card. How did we get from someone as genuine and real as Willem de Kooning to this simpering, smug careerist, shoving his new born son’s scrotum in Richard Avedon’s camera lens, leaving only enough room for his pouty, petulant bad boy scowl? Hilariously, Mr. Avedon, even at the end, was at the top of his game and captured perfectly the seemingly not very bright Mr. Currin in fine, and revealing form. The picture in The New Yorker is indeed worth a thousand words.

(As a side note - for all of the musicians here at Sharkforum who may or may not be conversant with the topic here, its kind of like the question "what exactly is the path that leads from say Bob Dylan to a creature like Britney Spears," in all of her towering badassedness for instance.)

Its interesting: in Norman Rockwell’s illustration The Connoisseur – a mocking and somewhat condescendingly snide picture of a balding man in a suit contemplating a Pollock-like abstraction – we can now see a harbinger of what was to come. How the art world has indeed come full circle. How the mostly upper-middle class university trained denizens of all that is art, have managed through “a turgid mix of hipster metaphysics and academic aggression” to reassert what for them is comfortable, i.e.; certain plebian conceits and middleclass values as to what is ‘good.’ The urban equivalent here in Chicago could be something like the cultural criminality of razing the birthplace of that great American art form known as modern blues, Maxwell Street, and replacing it with a shit mall so all the northshore kids wouldn’t get too homesick while they are studying how to be artists at UIC, learning how to do what they are told. Indeed, a collapse in belief, a failure of imagination on a societal level or simply, The Revenge Of The Philistines.

I guess since they tore down his home, it’s only fair to ask, with all of their no doubt wonderful facilities and resources, has UIC produced even just one artist the caliber of Muddy Waters? Sorry, don’t think so. It’s kind of like MacDonalds –billions and billions served –but have they ever made a good one?

Lets face it, it takes a special and particular kind of stupidity, or mere cynical ambition perhaps, to think for instance that a maker of rather dead-in-the-water illustrations (done from photographs and made to be re-photographed for magazine covers, as almost all Rockwell’s were) can be compared to a technically brilliant painter like Soutine for instance, or Freud, or Kossoff. And yet today we have ‘critics’ like Dave Hickey for instance, smarmily suggesting that we should take Rockwell, hence Currin seriously in terms of painting. As Mr. Perl said, in response to this unfortunate and completely suspect concept (I paraphrase) “who told Mr. Hickey he knows anything about painting?”

But I digress. Now that we have this thing called the internet, we need to ask ourselves, do we really need the so called arbiters of what is important anymore? Their infrastructure, their being keepers of the gates, their angling for position no matter how inane or insipid their argument, as long as it means some form or another of influence and power are to be conferred upon them.... or shall we begin as artists to decide for ourselves what we think is cogent and relevant? I know it’s a tall order in an art world populated with so many chicken littles, but perhaps the idea of ‘question authority!’ is an idea whose time has come, and has some currency for the times and ground we inhabit.

I don’t know. Maybe its just me, but as a painter, I am really not so interested in some dried out hack of a department head at some institution (any institution), or anyone else for that matter, telling me what ‘the issues’ are, if you know what I mean.

Am I advocating some form of noble savage? Errr...of course not. But I am advocating for a world in which people know their places, and that artists, not art educators, not curators, not critics, should set the agenda. I know – what a concept huh?

Sharkforum is about artists, and others, creating their own context – both cyber- and site-specific. We have gotten this thing up and running, and that being said, The Shark is going to do exactly what it is that sharks do, which is swim around and chomp on things.

To be continued...

"Faster Painting, Move Move!"
Part 5: Brandl and Bullock in Europe

b_b_intro5.jpg


(Brandl and Leonard Bullock continue their debate about contemporary painting, as seen four shows in Basel, Switzerland and nearby locales in Europe.)

MSB: Now we are definitely Siskel and Ebert. In order to over simplify our opinions, let’s assign the shows each rows of up to five paint brushes instead of stars.

LB: Well, maybe. Anyway, let’s hope that there is now, following The No Final Picture show, a moratorium on the endgame gambit. As Wallace Stevens said, “The freshness of this idea has been fresh a long time.”

MSB: I enjoyed the show, but would also love to see it as a summation and large “full stop” applied to the endgame declarative. The third of the leading exhibition triumvirate was After Reality – Realism and Current Painting at the Kunsthalle. Entirely featuring representational work, it promised to be surprising, perhaps even controversial. Adding to such expectations was the fact that the curator Peter Pakesch has put together some of the best painting shows in Europe over the last few years, such as his Nach-Bild of 1999. After Reality was in this light, however, disappointing. A few minor yet delightful works such as those by Silvia Gertsch or the always impressive “bathroom window” paintings by Chuck Close couldn’t make the issue of figuration quite the novel question that I had hoped the show would be. Perhaps such a contention will be possible in a few more years. Still, Pakesch and the Kunsthalle must be applauded for all the previous painting shows, such as that of Hanspeter Hofmann, which clearly helped inspire this whole current panorama in Basel. It is a shame that later that year Pakesch left for the Landesmuseum Joanneum in Graz, Austria.

b_b_close.jpg

Chuck Close painting


b_b_ger.jpg

Silvia Gertsch painting

LB: Graz, in far eastern Austria, has at times been very culturally active. It is nestled between Hungary, Slovenia and Italy. Therein it has the feel of a cultural crossroads, similar to Basel, but at the other edge of central Europe. Mr. Pakesch is a player and will undoubtedly grow in significance in the future. He is ahead of the curve of curators who have wedded knowledge of the gallery world with that of the art institution. Many, including those who didn’t profit directly during his tenure, will be sorry to see him go. He may be a Mandarin, but benevolently so: an archetypal European eclectic. He is a network man, but not exclusively. I shudder to think what kind of nouvelle puritans usually get such jobs. There are myriad ideologues waiting in the wings with baited breath to show us the “proper way to the future.”

To Be Continued .....

January 18, 2006

Memories of Sundance 2005

Lanterns.jpg
Lanterns
Next week, photographs from Park City, Utah, home of the 2006 Sundance Film Festival. Here are images from the 2005 edition.





Park & Heber.jpg
At the base of Main Street





Red White Blue.jpg
Red White Blue





Heber.jpg
Sky toward Heber





Library.jpg
Park City Library, 3:10am





id crisis.jpg
I. D. crisis





After the Sundance Channel party.jpg
After the Sundance Channel party





Mints.jpg
Mints





More photos here.

January 16, 2006

Simone Muench's Poem of the Week: "4 Ghazals for the Turn of the Century" by Marilyn Krysl

marilynkrysl-copy.jpg





Marilyn Krysl has published seven books of poetry and three of stories, as well as poems in The Atlantic, The Nation, and The New Republic. She has received two NEA fellowships and the Lawrence Foundation Prize for fiction. She is former Director of the Creative Writing Program at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She has taught ESL in the People’s Republic of China, served as Artist in Residence at the Center for Human Caring, worked as a volunteer for Peace Brigade International in Sri Lanka, and volunteered at the Kalighat Home for the Destitute and Dying administered by Mother Teresa’s Sisters of Charity in Calcutta. She just returned from Sri Lanka for the 6th time, where she volunteered for an NGO that works in Tsunami relief and peace-making among the three ethnic groups on the island. Her book Warscape with Lovers received the 1996 CSU Poetry Center Prize.

4 Ghazals for the Turn of the Century
1)
The elephant, bound, thinks longingly
of the elephant grave.

--The Hinayana

Look: see the peasant blasted at his crop.
The refugees kidnapped, made to carry ammunition.

The missiles dismantled, rebuilt, reinstalled.
The carcinogenic apples, the bereft gorilla mother.

The Vietnam vet propped against plate glass.
The six-year-old girl, the photographs of the body.

Friend phones long distance, love affair going badly.
I’ve forgotten the word for the double bladed axe.

Meanwhile the sky goes on with its watercolor.
Leaves, gorgeous, fall. The baby cries to be fed.

I feed the baby, watch the sky do its masterpiece.
The peasant again, rice green, his face burst open.


3)
Watch my chic black. I attract the damaged man.
He sees a deep breast, a spring of milk.

He thinks if he touches me, if I let him touch me,
his hands will heal, he will play the piano again,

and his feeling, boarded up in rage,
will come forth and stand in the light, upright.

He imagines the water, its hands, their balm.
He imagines the queen in her fat honeycomb.

I take the first plane to the other side of the world.
When I arrive, he’s there, waiting.

He thinks love heals, he thinks I am the healer.
He imagines the damaged can repair one another.


11)
When they shaved my head, I agreed I deserved it.
When they shaved me below, I agreed I deserved it.

They took the money for drugs. I told the girl, No bread.
They took the money for guns. I told the boy, Go to work.

Nor did I question the accidents, the disappearances,
though by then I knew they were lying.

Then they came for me, they held my head under water.
They let me breathe. They held me under again.

Three held me down while the others hurt me.
Look: here they carved their names on my body.

They made me dig, go in the hole, lie down.
They filled the hole. They piled on stones.

This is the place. You are in the presence of gods.
Don’t lie. When you lie the gods have to wait.

The books have been burned. There are no instructions.
This is the bottom. Proceed without instructions.



12)
for Hedda Nussbaum, 1989

Black is the color of my true love’s hair
Black is the color of her face, it’s torn flap

Black is the color of my hands, fallen off
Black is the color of his teeth, fallen out

Black is the color of his mouth as he eats
Black is the color of her orphan name between his teeth

Black is the color of the first day I let him hurt her
Black is the color of the first day I helped him hurt her

Black is the color of the last day I helped him hurt her
Black is the color of the bathroom floor, the water

Black is the color of the days that stretch behind me
Black is the color of the days that stretch before me

Black is the color of now; this moment
Black my charred heart at the center of this moment


By Marilyn Krysl.
Purchase at amazon.com.

Joel Dorn's NYC: Volume 4

boys.jpg





mannequin





mannequin





rain shadow





street reflection





arches


January 14, 2006

You So Ugly...


Mohammed Ali, king of the trash talkers once said, “I’m so mean I make medicine sick.” Anyone on the end of Ali’s taunts; ask Joe Frazier, really had no choice but to laugh it off, or let it frustrate you to the point of distraction. In sports news this week, trash talk has popped up as a hot topic as the Chicago Bears have prepared to play the Panthers.
But I have to wonder if we’re losing our trash talking abilities as a nation. Adewale Ogunleye started it all with, “They had all the hype coming in and we felt they didn't deserve it, and again they're getting a lot more hype than they should." The newspapers took him to task for this incendiary piece of bulletin board fodder. Safety Mike Brown followed with, “We know we can beat them. I think they think they can beat us. But we know we can beat them." Na na na na na. These words are enough to send Carolina over the edge in getting fired up to beat the Bears? Enough to mentally push them for sixty minutes in front of 60,000 screaming fans and a national television audience of millions in order to outscore them? Them’s some pretty good fightin’ words, eh? C’mon, we can do better than that. I offer the words of Mohammed Ali as inspiration:

“Frazier is so ugly that he should donate his face to the US Bureau of Wild Life.”

“I'll beat him so bad he'll need a shoehorn to put his hat on.”

Of course Ali did cross the line by calling Frazier a “gorilla” and an “Uncle Tom”, but he did apologize years later. Ali reserved some of his best trash talk for the U.S. government concerning the issue of going to Viet Nam:

“I ain't draft dodging. I ain't burning no flag. I ain't running to Canada. I'm staying right here. You want to send me to jail? Fine, you go right ahead. I've been in jail for 400 years. I could be there for 4 or 5 more, but I ain't going no 10,000 miles to help murder and kill other poor people. If I want to die, I'll die right here, right now, fightin' you, if I want to die. You my enemy, not no Chinese, no Vietcong, no Japanese. You my opposer when I want freedom. You my opposer when I want justice. You my opposer when I want equality. Want me to go somewhere and fight for you? You won't even stand up for me right here in America, for my rights and my religious beliefs. You won't even stand up for my right here at home.”

Touché.

Finally I want to offer up what I think are the two best instances of trash talk in song; the first from Mr. Bob Dylan in full skewer of a rival :

“Yes, I wish that for just one time you could stand inside my shoes. You'd know what a drag it is to see you”

The second is from Mr. J. Rotten:

“God save the queen she aint no human being”

Now that’s talking the talk.

January 13, 2006

Friday Night Fever

Two interesting openings:
gardenfresh features Milwaukee artist Kathryn Martin who will have an installation.

6-10 pm, through February 17th - 840 W. Washington 2nd floor


Gallery 40000 presents "Versus, Photography & Sculpture", "A Group Exhibition featuring 12 artists exploring the interstices that exists between these two mediums."

7-10pm - 1001 N Winchester
gardenfresh features Milwaukee artist Kathryn Martin who will have an installation.

6-10 pm, through February 17th - 840 W. Washington 2nd floor


Gallery 40000 presents "Versus, Photography & Sculpture", "A Group Exhibition featuring 12 artists exploring the interstices that exists between these two mediums."

7-10pm - 1001 N Winchester

Letters From The Earth

TheLetter.gif


Ath-bhliain fe mhaise dhuit!!!!
i.e. HAPPY NEW YEARS (IN GAELIC)

NOW I AM GOING TO WORK ON,,,,SHPREKKIN' DE GUD ENGLISH!!!!

Below is my last weekend's schedule which started off the New Years off in sunny Tarpon Springs Florida, after shoveling snow here in the freezing hills of Putnam Valley, NY.

It was a wonderful concert, from Mozart and Bach to Scott Joplin and Duke Ellington. I hadn't been to Tarpon Springs since the winter of 1936-37 when I went to the first grade in Passagrille Florida, so seventy years later, it was nice to make a comeback!!! Dancer-2.gif

The concert was such a success that at the orchestra and myself were invited back to do a new program this Fall.

We have a whole series of upcoming concerts throughout Florida, as well as Alabama, Georgia and in 2007 in New York, New Jersey and the East.

The members of the orchestra are an extraordinary group of young virtuoso soloists and chamber music players who love to play and each get a chance to shine during the concert.

The founder of the orchestra, a 32 year old violist, Amichai Hendel, is not only a world class soloist.

He books the orchestra, does the press, manages the finances, organizes the tours and works with me to assure that we continue to program the treasures of classical music played in the correct traditional styles, along with some of the treasures of contemporary music, including works inspired by Jazz, Latin American influences and elements of what is now called World Music.

Audiences love it and at 75, to become the Artistic Director as well as conductor of a brand new orchestra is really exciting and fulfilling!!

Banjo-Player.gif For all my other activities, (the two new symphonic works I am composing, my new book and appearances at all kinds of events) you can check out my webpage www.davidamram.com under Upcoming Events and then Personal Appearances) I'll be working on my "Symphonic Variations on a Theme by Woody Guthrie" as well as planning future programs for the Renaissance Classical Orchestra, completing my new book "Nine Lives of a Musical Cat" , creating a score for a major film, as well as a bunch of other projects and appearances, and planning a series of events at Denver University, where I am Distinguished Visiting Professor, from April 11-June 4th, which will be documented by BBC in London and broadcast in English speaking countries around the world. And during my two months in Denver, I will still be able to fly to all my concerts from Denver.

My three kids will also participate with me in some of the upcoming events this year, performing with me. In addition, they each have groups of their own, and sometimes I am lucky enough to be invited to join them, which is the biggest thrill of all!!!

African-with-Pipes.gifSince my insane (but joyous) schedule doesn't include enough spare time to allow me to age properly, I realize the truth in the old adage from Uzbekistan, where people often live to be 110 years old.......

.........LIFE BEGINS AT 75!!!

I hope you are thriving, and send all good energy and blessings to you and your family until our paths cross again.

With Joy and kicks for this '06

David

P.S.
Below is the concert we just did as well as the program notes which I wrote for it. I wish you could have been there to hear it. Fortunately it was videoed, and eventually will be broadcast.

Orchestra-2.gif



Tarpon Springs Performing Arts Center
Jan. 7th 2005
The Renaissance Classical Orchestra
Amichai Hendel
Founder and President
David Amram
Artistic Director and Conductor

A NOTE TO OUR AUDIENCE FROM THE ARTISTIC DIRECTOR

This evening's concert in Tarpon Springs is a special occasion for our orchestra to celebrate both the New Year and the Hellenic culture which has enriched the loves of all citizens of the United States and the world.

Guitarist-1.gifMy first musical mentor, Dimitri Mitropoulos, the great conductor to whose memory this concert is dedicated, always treasured his Greek heritage.

He taught all of us lucky enough to know him that we should understand why the ancient Hellenic artists and philosophers changed the world, and that we should apply their wisdom and idealism to our own life's work in music.  He stressed the enduring value of always pursuing excellence, working tirelessly, respecting others and sharing what we learned with the world, in the same egalitarian and gracious way that Socrates and the ancient Greek philosophers did during their lifetimes. He told me all this sixty years ago when I first met him in June of 1946, as a 15 year old kid who dreamed of having a life in music.

He explained to me that we could all make the world a better place by following the example of the ancient Greeks, and made me believe I could dare to pursue my dreams.

He also loved contemporary classical composers as much as he did Mozart and Bach, and also appreciated the innovations of the modern American jazz masters. He always said that true music is built to last, and that every form of great music became a stone in theJ-S-Bach-2.gif mountain that we must climb in order to see, when we reached the top, that all these kinds of heartfelt music would make a more beautiful world for ourselves and our children.

We thank all of you for being here tonight.

Eimai efharistimenos pou eimai etho mazi sou.
(I am happy to be here with you.)
Na zisei iEllatha kai Na zisei Tarpon Springs!
(Long live Greece, long live Tarpon Springs!)

David Amram
Jan. 7th 2005


Luggage-1.gif

Tarpon Springs Performing Arts Center
Jan. 7th 2005

PROGRAM

DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY AND LEGACY OF DIMITRI MITROPOULOS

Canon for Strings
Johann Pachelbel (1653-1706)    

The South German composer Johann Pachelbel was known as one of the leading organists of his time as well as for being a prolific composer. Canon was originally written for three violins and continuo, but in the last hundred years, this work has become a repertoire piece for string orchestra, as realized by Helmut May in this German edition published by Schott. Also a great educator, Pachelbel tutored many members of the Bach family, including the young Johann Sebastian Bach.
Pachelbel was known in his time as the "geistige Stammvater Bach" or the intellectual progenitor of Bach.

Nocturne for String Orchestra from String Quartet #2 in D major
Alexander Borodin (1833-1887)
(arranged for String Orchestra by Sir Malcolm Sargent)


Alexander Porfyrevich Borodin was not only hailed as a major composer of his era. He was also a renowned scientist. His music, like that of his fellow Russian composers Mily Balakirev, Cesar Cui, Alexander Borodin, Modest Mussorgsky and Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov, brought a new ingredient into the standard repertoire, with works that reflected pride in their shared rich Russian folk heritage, always brilliantly orchestrated with evocative melodies and rhythmic gusto.

Nocturne has had many incarnations since its inception as a movement of Borodin's String Quartet #2 in D., even being used in musicals, popular songs and a variety of transcriptions. Sir Malcolm Sargent's arrangement is usually the one which sets the standard, maintaining the clarity and purity of the original chamber version

Brandenburg Concerto #3
Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750)

In 2005, Bach remains the master musician whose compositions remain as fresh and vital in this millennium as they were when he composed them three hundred years ago. Like his teacher Pachelbel, Bach was as well known for his skills as an improviser as he was as a composer.

When the Margate of Brandenburg commissioned Bach to write six concertos, the request was for tafle musik, specifically music to be created and played as an accompaniment to outdoor picnic meals. Just as Michaelangelo exceeded the role of a housepainter touching up the Sistine Chapel, Bach's six Brandenburg Concertos remain priceless gems.

The keyboard players in Bach's time were required to play the continuo, which was improvised by whoever performed the part, and always had to fit into the harmonic structure of the composition, with only the bass notes and an indication of the harmonies notated.

In the Brandenburg Concerto #3, the second movement, adagio, only has two chords, an A minor and a B dominant seventh written down by Bach. It was assumed that whoever played the harpsichord when creating the continuo embellishments in the first and third movements would be able to make up something on the spot to serve as a transition between the energetic and impassioned first and third movements. For tonight's performance, the solo cadenza will be played during this brief interlude between the outer two movements by a member of the orchestra, as it was done in Bach's time, constructed on motifs which appear in the concerto, and embellished and developed by the soloist, played over the two chords which Bach wrote in the score.

Viola Concerto in G
George Philipp Telemann (1681-1767)
Largo
Allegro
Andante
Presto

Amichai Hendel Viola soloist

Telemann’s Viola Concerto in G Major, is one of his most frequently performed works, and one of the first major concertos ever written for the viola. Telemann was even more prolific than Bach, writing an enormous amount of music during his long life.  While he became the most famous composer of his time in Germany, composing operas, cantatas and instrumental music, the viola concerto remains one of his most popular works today.

His mother was against the idea of her son becoming a musician, so he agreed to study law, but as a student made the acquaintance of George Fredrich Handel and they became life long friends. Years later, Handel said admiringly that Telemann "could write a church piece in eight parts with the same ease and facility that someone else would demonstrate when they were writing a letter."

Unlike all the other composers on tonight's program, who struggled from day to day to survive, Telemann became a very wealthy man during his lifetime, through the sales of his compositions, and proved to his mother that the legal profession's loss was music's gain.

INTERMISSION

Violin Concerto in C Major
Joseph Haydn (1732-1809)
Allegro moderato
Adagio
Finale (Presto)

Violin soloist  Valentin Mansurov

Haydn is often called the father of the symphony as well as the first master of the string quartet.
Unlike his contemporary and friend Mozart,, Haydn, while being an excellent multi-instrumentalist and equally prolific composer, was a more modest and less theatrical personality.  Mozart's brilliant concertos reflect Mozart's genius as a brilliant performer, Haydn's concertos were never composed to show dazzling displays of virtuosity Haydn once said "At no instrument was I a wizard."
 
Haydn wrote three violin concertos, and the Violin Concerto in C Major was entered in Haydn's private catalogue of his own works around 1765. His two other violin concertos and his trumpet concerto are repertoire pieces today, and remain gems of the classical period of composition which he and Mozart personified.
 
When Haydn was chosen to work at the Esterházy court, he Esterházy orchestra wasn't large.  It was a chamber string orchestra, the same size as the RCO's orchestra which is playing this evening's concert.  it eventually grew to twenty-five-players, but from the beginning, the concert master was Luigi Tomasini. who began his service for Prince Paul Anton Esterházy as the Prince's personal valet. The Prince soon found Tomasini to be so talented that he was sent to Italy to study music, and upon his return, became concert master of the court orchestra.

Fortunately for the history of classical music, The Esterházy Palace's Prince, Paul Anton was an accomplished musician, who played violin, lute and flute, and kept Haydn employed as a full time composer.

While history honors Prince Paul Anton as the leading arts funder of his day, it is interesting to note that Haydn's yearly salary was one-tenth the amount of money which he allotted to his wife and himself for their royal wardrobe.

While we no longer remember what fashionable clothes the royal couple wore in the 1775s, Haydn's Violin Concerto in C Major, like all his other music, remains a treasure for the world to hear, and sounds as fresh as ever.

The Entertainer and Maple  Leaf Rag
Scott Joplin (1868-1917)
(adapted by William Zinn)

Born in Texarkana Texas, both Scott Joplin and his music are more popular today than ever, thanks to Robert Redford's use of Joplin's music in the film The Sting.
Due to the devotion and painstaking scholarship of Yale's musicologist Vivian Perlis and composer Gunther Schuller, Joplin's music is now being performed in concert halls around the world. Joplin never lived to hear a full performance of his most ambitious surviving work, the opera Treemonisha. Composed in 1910, it was finally premiered January 27, 1970 with Atlanta Symphony conducted by Robert Shaw, and has been performed internationally.

Joplin was a piano virtuoso  confined to the rough and ready world of dance halls in red light districts in the last fifteen years of the 1800s, but always found the time to compose meticulous  well crafted works, using the traditional European classical  system of notation, all of which paved the way for his signature piece Maple Leaf Rag, which became a worldwide hit in 1899 and launched the Ragtime craze. Violinist William Zinn had long been an admirer of Joplin's music, and gave me several of his transcriptions of Joplin's rags, which he adapted for string orchestra.

C Jam Blues
Duke Ellington (1899-1974)
(arranged by David Amram)
Adam Amram, percussion and harmonica
David Amram, piano, pennywhistles, and dumbek.

Edward Kennedy Ellington remains one of America's most significant musical giants of the twentieth century, enormously productive as a composer in all genres, as well as a masterful pianist and bandleader. He brought a symphonic concept to the world of jazz from the 1920s until his death in 1974.

When I conducted the New York premiere of the Symphonic version of his "Black, Brown and Beige" orchestrated by Maurice Peress at the Lincoln center in 1972, , Duke told me that in addition to his ballet scores, sacred works and orchestral pieces, he liked the idea of some of his songs being done
where the conductor also performed in the role of soloist and bandleader, bringing the egalitarian and inclusive spirit of jazz into the symphonic arena, much as the Baroque composers and soloists of the 18th Century always included improvising as a part of music making.

"Someday, all musicians will be able to interpret Bach and Beethoven and plays the blues" he told me. "It's all great music. Tell all the young musicians you meet to always listen intently, work tirelessly and be creative."

This version of C Jam Blues is done within the framework of the instrumentation of the RCO. In future performances, I hope to have some of the splendid classical virtuoso artists of the orchestra improvise with me in this wonderful Ellington sketch.

Eine Kleine Nachtmusik  K.-V. 525
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756-1791)
Allegro
Romanze Andante
Menuetto Allegretto
Rondo Allegro

One of Mozart's most popular works, Eine Kleine Nachtmusik was scored for two violins, viola, cello and bass violin. While many scholars feel that the piece was intended to be played by a string orchestra, others believe that Mozart intended it top be played by a string quartet, with the bass as an extra instrument that was optional. To add to the mystery of this stunning piece, there is a movement that is missing; a second  Minuet and Trio, which was customary in the South German
Serenades written during Mozart's time, a tradition which continued through the years when Brahms composed works using this form.

According to Mozart's own Catalogue, he completed this little masterpiece August 10, 1787, at the same time he was composing Act Two of his monumental opera Don Giovanni. We will never know what the lost Minuet and Trio sounded like, but the four movements that are here set a musical standard for all composers and listeners.
Like most of the other composers on this evening's program. Mozart was also a brilliant performer and improviser, loved music of many cultures in addition to the one he was born into, and created music that has stood the test of time.

Program notes by David Amram

Radio-2.gif

David Amram Bio

Recently appointed as the Renaissance Classical Orchestra's Artistic Director and Conductor by RCO's president and founder Amichai Hendel, David Amram is described by The Boston Globe as "the Renaissance man of American music." Amram is one of the most acclaimed classical composers of his generation.

Since 1974 to the present day, he is listed by BMI as one of the Twenty Most Performed Composers of Concert Music in the United States. Chosen as the first Composer-in-Residence with the New York Philharmonic (1966-67) at the invitation of Leonard Bernstein, he has composed over 100 orchestral, choral and chamber works, and two operas, including the critically acclaimed and nationally telecast opera of the Holocaust The Final Ingredient, an excerpt of which has been recorded by Naxos Records for the Milken Archive Series, in an all-Amram CD, Symphony-Songs of the Soul.

Amram composed music for the classic films Splendor in the Grass, and the original 1962 version of The Manchurian Candidate, released as a soundtrack album for the first time this past September by Varese-Sarabande records. Early in his career he composed the music for 17 Broadway productions, and eighty-five Off-Broadway productions.

He plays French horn, piano, guitar, numerous flutes and whistles, percussion, and a variety of folkloric instruments from 25 countries, and is acknowledged as a pioneer of World Music and improvised French horn since the 1950s. He has conducted and performed as a soloist with symphony orchestras around the world, participated in major music festivals, and traveled from Brazil to Cuba and from Kenya to Egypt.

While actively assimilating the musical cultures of the countries he has visited, he has kept up a remarkable pace of composing, incorporating his experiences in the worlds of jazz, folk and ethnic music as inspiration and basic material for his formal compositions. Amram has guest conducted over 100 different orchestras around the World over the past forty-five years, and was the Music Director for 29 years of the Brooklyn Philharmonic's Young Peoples & Parks Concerts, where he combined Jazz, Latin & World Music with the symphonic standard repertoire, as conductor, soloist and narrator.

He has collaborated with such notables as Leonard Bernstein, Sir James Galway, Dizzy Gillespie, Lionel Hampton, Charles Mingus, Dustin Hoffman, Thelonious Monk, Willie Nelson, Jack Kerouac, Betty Carter, Odetta, Elia Kazan, Arthur Miller, Johnny Depp, Frank McCourt and Tito Puente. David Amram and Jack Kerouac gave the first-ever jazz/poetry reading in NYC, at the Brata Art Gallery in October of 1957, vividly recounted in Amram's own two books, Vibrations, (dedicated to the memory of Dimitri Mitropolous,

Amram's musical mentor since 1945) and Offbeat: Collaborating With Kerouac. Amram's new flute concerto, commissioned by Sir James Galway, Giants of the Night, dedicated to the memories of Charlie Parker, Jack Kerouac and Dizzy Gillespie, all three of whom he knew and played with, was recently premiered by Sir James Galway, who plans to record it. He is currently composing two new works: a Mass, Missa Manhattan, with author Frank McCourt, and Symphonic Variations on a Song by Woody Guthrie, commissioned by the Guthrie Foundation. At 75, he continues to tour the World as a conductor, soloist, narrator in five languages, band leader and visiting scholar, while composing new music. Amram's webpage, www.davidamram.com has information of his nonstop activities.

David Drew Longey – Blood From a Stone

banjo.jpgLiving in New York City I sometimes feel like I’ve lost touch with what author Greil Marcus called that “Old Weird America.” I’m thousands of miles from Wall Drug. Haven’t seen a Jackalope in well over a decade. Snipes can’t handle TV sets and boom boxes.
Want nothin’ to do with NYU students wobbling down the sidewalks, high on beer. Gotham is the land of bright lights and advertising. Myths need moonlight, wild winds whipping through primeval forests. Solitude. That’s when I think of my pal David Drew Longey up in Greenfield, Massachusetts. Longey is a banjo picker and builder of fantastic igloos.

A Zen mediator who spontaneously composes hillbilly koans with the thrum and jangle of the much-maligned four-string drumguitar - the shortest of which - “Bendy,” clocks in at thirty-six seconds while his opus “Running Down A Hill” barely makes it over the three minute mark What’s intriguing about this disc is its butt-nekked honesty. David Drew Longey doesn’t call himself a musician. He’s best known as a visual artist and a crackerjack web designer. He’s hardly gunnin’ for banjo slingers like Bela Fleck or Danny Barnes.

Hell, he makes Peter Stampfel sound downright schooled! But there’s a stark and genuine beauty to this rough and ragged collection that recalls the front porch pickin’ of Michael Hurley and the tone poems the late great John Fahey at times. My favorite number is the last tune, “Innertumbling” which features a Jew’s harp soaked in a vat of reverb. Robin Williamson of the 60’s folk duo the Incredible String Band claimed that “inspired amateurism” was their mantra for plunging ahead into unknown territory with instruments they barely the names or tunings of.

This is not to say Dave doesn’t know what he’s doing or where he’s going, although he takes a couple surprising twists and turns on this sonic backwoods tour of that Old Weird America that I’m glad to know is still out there.

For a taste of Dave’s art, banjo picking and ice architecture go to www.handofdave.com

Another Platform


anotherPlatform.gif
.

January 12, 2006

Cover Painting: All Words are Lies

brandl_words_lies.jpg

It's true.
All words are lies. Especially things called "text." So this time I'll shut up and just show my painting. .

somnophilia, n.

somnaphelia.gif

somnophilia, n.
Also called sleeping princess syndrome, is a paraphilia in which sexual arousal and/or orgasm are stimulated by intruding on and awakening a sleeping stranger with erotic caresses. Somnophilia may also refer to having sex with a sleeping partner.

From Wikipedia .

January 11, 2006

The Tree

The Tree.jpg
The Tree





The Tree 2.jpg
The Tree 2





The Tree 3.jpg
The Tree 3





The Tree 4.jpg
The Tree 4





The Tree 5.jpg
The Tree 5





More photos here.

catheterophila, n.

cath.gif

catheterophila, n.
Paraphilic condition in which a person is sexually aroused by the insertion of a catheter.

From Sex-Lexis

Faster Painting! Move! Move!” Part 4. Brandl and Bullock in Europe.


b_b_intro4.jpg
(Brandl and Leonard Bullock continue their debate about contemporary painting, as seen in a quartet of shows in Basel, Switzerland and nearby locales in Europe.)

........
MSB: Bernard Frize is a favorite of mine. Conceptual and performance-based, yet highly sensual.

LB: It made me hungry for a gelatti — four colored scoops. Along with Herbert Brandl’s amorphous landscape abstractions, Frize’s flowing strokes are a reminder that art can be made with one’s entire body.

MSB: And with the entire bodies of others too, since Frize often creates paintings using the combined choreographed actions of groups of assistants and himself. I have to add that Herbert, while a friend of mine, is no relation. Except maybe a way-way-way distant one. He is Austrian, I'm American, yet according to an article in Wikipedia, we may both have a distant common ancestor in the Bohemian, late Baroque painter Petr Jan Brandl. (Here's the one on me.)

b_b-friz.jpg
Bernard Frize painting

LB: Back to Frize. This is off the portentous theoretical radar screen. All Frize’s staining and flowing remind viewers of former times when critics spoke of painting in relation to human sexuality. Adrian Schiess is represented by one of his “installed,” monochrome, sprayed floor panel works. The colors change as one circles the piece. Schiess has been complaining the last few years that no one wants to show his newer paintings. Well, they are on display, but not here, rather included in the Beyeler Foundations exhibition of “Descendants of Monet.” Schiess’s works are painterly abstraction, new material hybrids...

MSB: ...Mostly splotches of acrylic paint on torn scraps of cardboard, I believe...

LB: ...that’s right, but painterly ones which weren’t in the Move shows, not the torn ones. They are unabashedly gestural; at least half the decisions in them were made in media res.

MSB: Here I would disagree, much as you did with Brice Marden. I can enjoy Schiess’s floor works on occasion, but not always, and I have immense difficulty with his so-called “scrap” paintings. I know from one of his dealers that this is less new than a return to his approach from before he devised the minimalist floor installations (in which period he also did sloppy paintings on his face), yet I see it has a cliched, Dada-inspired gesture in which no decisions were reached beyond the theatrical one to present the “abject” object. A rather desperate grasping for a handhold to climb out of a self-imposed dungeon. I think you’ve read into the work what would be great if it were there.

b_b-schie.jpg
Adrian Schiess painting

Now we are definitely Siskel and Ebert. In order to over simplify our opinions, let’s assign the shows each rows of up to five paint brushes instead of stars.

LB: Well, maybe...

To Be Continued ........

January 10, 2006

hybristophilia, n.

hibr.gif
hybristophilia, n.
A paraphilia involving sexual arousal by people who have committed crimes; in particular cruel, or outrageous crimes. Some view them with dismay.

From Wikipedia

zoophiliacs

grin2.jpg I wondered what you were all doing here! -Just stay away from me with your sick zoophilia- we sharks are not a bunch of perverts like you humans- .

Guided by Sharks

Wes _ Rob.JPG .

January 09, 2006

Consider The Shark Attack.....


gws36_t.gif

Most of the time when a human encounters a great white shark, it's hunting something; at other times these animals hide with expert slyness. But even when a great white shark is in quiet reconnaissance mode, stalking on the periphery, its presence is overwhelming. You can feel them, a phenomenon acknowledged by researchers, surfers, divers-anyone who's spent enough time on the water to have had a brush with one. The only thing more powerful than a great white's arrival is that prelude instant right before the fin appears because, somehow, you know it's coming. I have heard surfers refer to this sixth sense as 'that sharky feeling' and 'the creeps'..........

Susan Casey, from The Devil's Teeth

Thirteen Best Horror Film Titles of 2005 (in no particular order)


19m.jpg

1) Needle Anus
2) The Witches of Breastwick
3) Not Dead Enough
4) Motor Home Massacre
5) Weenie Roast Massacre
6) Sugar and Shit
7) Slaughterhouse of the Rising Sun
8) Skankobite
9) Boy Eats Girl
10) Satan's House of Yoga
11) The Gingerdead Man
12) G-String Vampire
13) The Cactus that Looked Just Like a Man




simonelSM.jpg More Blogs by Simone Muench | EMail Simone


.

Simone Muench's Poem of the Week: "Imitations and Collage: from the Poems of Blas De Otero" by Robert Archambeau

1844710491.01.gif





Robert Archambeau was born in the USA but grew up in Canada. He studied literature at the University of Manitoba and the University of Notre Dame and has taught at Notre Dame and Lund University (Sweden). He currently teaches at Lake Forest. He has also edited two books, Word Play Place: Essays on the Poetry of John Matthias and Vectors: New Poetics. His book Home and Variations is available from Salt Modern Poets.

"Imitations and Collage: from the Poems of Blas De Otero"


1. FROM EACH ACCORDING TO WHAT HE KNOWS
a version of Otero's "Que Cada Uno Aporte Lo Que Sepa"

It's true, you know: you can love a person,
a little toad — don't step on it —

and also a continent like Europe,
always split or wounded or crying horribly.

Some words disturb us, you and me,
"treaty," "theater of operations,"

"end of major fighting," "nothing serious,"
and others too.

But people, they believe all that,
hang bunting, run flags from the windows,

as if it were true,
as if such a thing...

It happens, I've seen them myself,
all Easter hats and roses.

In '39 they called the poor men out to Mass,
pulled fuses from a few bombs,

and set off fireworks along the water:
at it again.

After, I heard voices in the next room,
a woman screaming, mad and awful.

We knew,
we knew more than enough.



2. WORDS GATHERED FOR ANTONIO MACHADO
a version of Otero's "Palabras Reunidas Para Antonio Machado"

a solitary heart
is no heart
.
--A.M.

If I dared
to speak, to call for you. . .
but I am, alone,
no one.

So.
I clench my fists and look to you root-place,
I listen to slow yesterday,
her ballads, all the people's songs--
rough Manrique, exact Frey Luis,
the quick-whip words of old Quevado--
and quick, too,
I touch the earth that has lost you,
and the sea that holds a ship that must find home.

And now,
now the plow has turned in salted soil,
now I'll say a few true words,
those with which I first sought a voice:

Elm sonorous with wind,
tall poplar, sluggish oak and olive,
trees of a dry land, and of sorrow--
come to clear water, to freedom, to peace


Sevilla cries. Soria, for once,
grows quiet. Baeza
lifts her sickles to the air, her olive trees
slow-moving to the wind's soft sorrow, which she reaps.
The sea itself falls fast on France to claim you--
it wants,
we want,
to have you here,
to share you out
like bread.



3. THE CLOISTER OF SHADOWS
a version of Otero's "El Claustro de las Sombras"

. . . to the antique order of the dead
--Francis Thompson

Just now I have thirty-three years piled on my study table
and a few months left over in the silver ashtray.
I've put this question to my sisters: do you know this man
between my left and right shoulders? He goes where I go,
and turns his face if I turn mine. . .

I grow cold, and don't know what to wear
beneath this cloaking death, don't know what plot of earth is mine,
what night I should prepare,
what green and silent ocean waits. . .

Sometimes I'd be a brother of the ancient order of the dead
and serve in silence; meditate in a corner of the dead,

in the cloister of shadows, there,
where dreams rise guileless in the smoky light.



4. COLLAGE: THE PUBLIC LIFE

If you reap a soft, slow moving sorrow,
If you gather years in a silver ashtray,

If you wait, a green and silent ocean,
If you serve the antique order of yourself,

If, at your study table,
you know, you know too much--

can you love a person, or a continent?
Can you turn and share yourself like bread?


By Robert Archambeau.
Purchase at Salt Modern Poets.

Open Thread

Let 'er rip! Art, film, politics - you name it. .

On Film & Music: Too Much Monkey Business


minkey.gifOh, come off it you big apes. I’ve seen a lot of best of lists for 2005 movies and I have to say I’m a little shocked to see King Kong on many of them. Unless you only saw ten movies this year I can’t imagine this three hour chest thump taking the place of smaller, better films like Phil Morrison’s “Junebug” or Werner Herzog’s “Grizzly Man”.

What seems to be the winning element that has people glowing over Peter Jackson’s epic is the “relationship” that develops between Naomi Watts and the big guy. I can almost hear Albert Brooks pitching it - King Kong has a heart, King Kong has a heart. There is no doubt that this indeed is what makes this film a success. It surely isn’t the interminable second act which takes us to Skull Island where the special effects are cool, but endlessly beat us over the head with beast after beastly beast effectively dulling the audience into wondering when we could just get back to New York. I think that we would all agree to give up at least 45 minutes of film budget in order to feed a small third world country for a month.

And isn’t it cute that the beast is bemused by the beauty? I wonder if the bears in Timothy Treadwell’s world found him charming and personable. We want to believe that animals find us lovable, but when it comes down to it I think that if my dog, Billy somehow got lost he would forget about me in favor of whoever would be lucky enough to find him. Gosh, it hurts my feelings to say that. Humans love it when animals seem human. I guess that’s why they throw cigarettes to chimps in zoos. Personally, I think the Snuggle talking bear is creepy.

Anyway, I have alternatives to King Kong, the movie which will take up far less of your time. First is the wonderful Kinks tune of the same name. You can find it on The Kink Kronikles or as a bonus track on the 2005 extended release of The Village Green Preservation Society. Ray Davies might say that man, not beauty killed the beast, or as he sang, “Everybody wants power, Everybody wants fame, Everybody wants money.”. If you’re hungry for prog-jazz-rock brilliance, Frank Zappa’s “King Kong” on 1969’s Uncle Meat record is only 18 minutes long. Drag City’s Louisville band King Kong has a groovin’ disc called “Me Hungry” that provides a cave man narrative that will make you forget about Peter Jackson’s racist island primitives. And finally I recommend buying the Upsetters great Super Ape on vinyl if you just want to look at the great beast while listening to dub at its finest. Or you can just wait with baited banana breath for the Kong director’s cut DVD. I smell Oscar!

Joel Dorn's NYC:
Volume 3

bear.jpg





boys.jpg





chef.jpg





wigs-1.jpg





legs.jpg


legs.jpg


legs.jpg


January 06, 2006

tmesis, n.

tmesis.gif

tmesis, n.
Separation of the parts of a compound word by one or more intervening words;

for example,
abso-fucking-lutely
or
Christ All-bleeding-mighty.

American Totems


The problem of the theologian is to keep his symbol translucent
so that it may not block out the very light it is supposed to convey.
- Joseph Campbell


According to a Passamaquoddy Indian named George I met at a rest stop on the Massachusetts Turnpike last week, the word totem means, “that to which a person or thing belongs.”
“It comes from the word ‘Wuhohtimoin,’” he said.

“That leaves it pretty open to interpretation,” I replied.

“Well, let’s just say it’s a natural object assumed by some Native American medicine societies for the purpose of maintaining a personal mythology. It helps give order and meaning to our lives. Something to hang on to.”

totem.gif“So then it could be a bowling ball,” I said. “I mean, wouldn’t you consider a bunch of guys who get together every Tuesday night at the local bowling alley ‘totemists?’ They cherish their bowling balls and wear matching windbreakers with their names and little bowling pins embroidered on them. Sounds like a cult to me…”

George grinned and shook his head. “I think you missed the point.”

“Now hold on a minute,” I said. “These guys belong to some sort of league. They get together every week. They have an unspoken understanding of the way things are done. They share stuff they feel is sacred – beer, hot dogs, pretzels, the sounds and smells of a bowling alley. Most likely these guys are direct descendants from some Neanderthal bear cult. They probably danced at Kwakiutl mummy feasts and believed a monster swallowed the moon on the lunar eclipse. These guys should be considered dangerous!”

George laughed. “Man, what have you been smokin’? And where can I get some?”

“I don’t smoke that stuff too much anymore,” I replied.

“Well what will you have?”

“Soy chai latte. Grande.”

“That’ll be $4.50. Now listen,” he said seriously. “A totem is like a shish kebob of images that tells a story, portrays a vision of the past, which if you keep close to, creates continuity to your life. You gain strength from it and a growing belief in who you are. This is not merely a preoccupation with an object. The worship of totems is regarded as marking a higher religious advancement than fetishism. In other words it’s better to have it on your front lawn than in your closet.”

With that I grabbed him by his little green apron and pulled him across the counter. “What the hell are you doing working at Starbucks?” I demanded.

“I make a mean Caramel Macchiato. And I need the health insurance,” he replied.

Matchmaker, Matchmaker, Make Me a Match

tortoisepalace.jpg Not since chocolate and peanut butter collided to make the Reese’s Cup has a flavor combo been so highly anticipated as the Tortoise/ Bonny Prince Billy recording, The Brave and the Bold.

Hey- you got singer on my instrumental band.
There’s no doubt that this collaboration works, especially on the Lungfish tune Love is Love and Bruuuuce’s Thunder Road. Add this release to 2005’s successful Calexico/ Iron and Wine recording, and it’s evident that Howard Greynolds of Overcoat Recordings has a formula that works. I expect that in the coming year you’ll see other labels trying to play matchmaker; it’s inevitable. Hopefully, artistic inspiration is behind it all like Bonny Tortoise and not some chase for the filthy lucre.

Will_Oldham.jpg Some bands, because of integral deceased members, have tried to keep the money train rolling by using the all-star combination. I still cringe at the last MC5 reunion that featured Evan Dando in Rob Tyner’s boots and Marshall Crenshaw !?!? taking the Fred “Sonic” Smith guitar duties. Evan- I loved you as the adorable Partridge-like front man of the saccharine Lemonheads, but seeing you lead my heroic MC5 like a speed freak college cheerleader (complete with cartwheels) seared my corneas. Marshall Crenshaw should stick to Beatlemania. INXS desperately sought anyone to keep the royalties rolling. When it works well it can be a revelation. David Thomas led Rocket From the Tombs with Television’s Richard Lloyd and Dead Boy Cheetah Chrome in one of the most memorable shows ever at the Abbey Pub a couple years back.

tortoise.jpgSo, with the prospect of love at first sight, matchmaking magic, I want to offer some proposals: P.J. Harvey with Shellac Steve worked magic as a producer with Polly, consider this high octane possibility.

Liz Phair and Hanson Hanson needs to be taken seriously and take it from PG to R; naughty milf Liz can give them “cred”. Liz just needs a hit.

Any suggestions out there? There’s money to be made!

Hokusai

hosukai.jpg

Damen below Division, Thursday, 1:41am. .

The View From a Train

viewfromthetrain.gif
.

January 05, 2006

Your Book Could Be My Life

ourband.jpg








Perhaps the best rock book in 10 years (even though the Motley Crue book is still funnier), “Our Band Could be Your LifeIS my life. Published in 2001 and then quickly out in paperback, “Our Band…” tells the story of the second punk rock revolution and how it was subsequently won (by Nirvana in 1991). The tale is told in thirteen chapters using the device of the biographer, one band per chapter. Gramophone-08.jpg

And so we begin our sweat-stained journey in California with Black Flag in 1979 or so and then look in on Mission of Burma in Boston and then the Minutemen and then on to Minneapolis for chapters on Husker Du and the Replacements (perhaps the best chapter in the book).

Modern-Music.jpg The overall effect of Azerrad’s meticulous attention to detail is to thoroughly document the slow, painful creation of what was once a thriving counter-cultural underground music “scene” (although I hate that word “scene” I find there is no other). This is the club circuit that sprang up in the wake of the original mid-70’s punks; a loose affiliation of gay clubs, biker bars, youth centers, art galleries, coffee shops and roadhouses that opened their doors to the likes of Sonic Youth, Big Black, Die Kruezen, Squirrel Bait, Yo La Tengo, Fugazi, Record-1.jpg Uncle Tupelo and many others. Anyone who did anything musically speaking on the road during the ‘80’s or ‘90’s owes a huge debt to everyone in this book. Indeed, plenty of readers will find many of their friends’ name prominently mentioned.

squirrelbait.jpg I can only add that tears came streaming from my eyes as I read reminiscences of fabled venues - venues within which my own tender feet did once tread - as the No Bar and Grill in Muncie, IN and the Metro in Chicago and the Pyramid in New York and the Middle East in Boston.

Azerrad ends his book just shy of Nirvana (about whom he has already written a book) with two chapters on Pacific-Northwest bands, Mudhoney and Beat Happening. This seems an attempt, not entirely unsuccessful, to portray Seattle’s brand of punk (“grunge”) as the death knell of “true” punk. Although I’m not sure I agree with this view, I must admit that the epilogue is a powerful summation and one which makes important points. Something did change in the music after 1991.

Alternative music was henceforth no longer grown locally, it was now a globally disseminated corporate product, and this change was apparently irrevocable. Today’s results are easy to see: cookie-cutter metal-rock-rap hybrids with no brains and no soul. Another in an endless series of triumphs of style over substance. Then again, Paul Westerberg is on tour and the Flaming Lips have a new concept album about defeating the goals of evil technology. Arthur Lee is out of jail and doing what are apparently some incredible live shows. “Our Band Could be Your Life” testifies to the existence of an era when things were very, very different from the way they are now, but that difference does not necessarily have to prevail. mersh.jpg



Note: this piece was written in 2002 - ed.

A Subjective Fable


Once upon a time my neighbor and I were walking up our front condo stairwell when passing a painting that we both have walked passed a hundred times he stopped, looked at the painting and said, “Is this good?”
Fable.jpg

I answered back with a resounding, “No!” Thinking this little exchange was over I headed for my door when I heard him utter, “Why not?” Feeling somewhat giddy that he wanted to talk “Art”, I said, “Hold on” and swiftly fetched a book containing reproductions of some of my favorite masterpieces to help prove my “No” point.

I then rolled up my sleeves, got on my soapbox and started proving why my examples were considered good art and this “furniture store-bought” painting hanging in our front stairwell was, well, bad art.

I pontificated on composition, harmony, balance and continued blabbering about color, form and tone. I felt a little cocky and even mentioned something about spatial orientation. Satisfied with my discourse my neighbor said, “Thank you” and added, “I learn something new everyday.”

Seeing my neighbor a few weeks later and wondering if he still had the “art bug” I invited him out for a visit to one of our city’s art museums. While strolling through the corridors we came upon a room which contained an ongoing exhibition that focused on local emerging artists. My neighbor and I were both looking at the featured paintings and I started thinking that this work was not very good. Again, I started pontificating about composition, harmony, balance, etc.—when all of a sudden a curator, a group of people and the artist himself came into the room: Artist Talk.

The curator started fawning all over the paintings. He was saying that this was very important work; he pontificated about composition, harmony, balance, etc. and I thought to myself, “Hey, wait just a minute....” Then the artist chimed in agreeing with the curator that yes, indeed this was important work. Having just about enough of this my neighbor slinked over to me and said, “This is a real museum and this is a real curator and that’s a real artist...right?” and then jokingly he added, “Well then my friend, you better go back to art school.” Glaring back and feeling a little small I was going to retort with a wisecrack of my own but then a big smile crossed my face and I thought, “Maybe we have a masterpiece back at home in our stairwell afterall.”

Until The Monkey Dies

OriginalKong.jpg
At once maddening and gloriously free and honorous of a mythical Hollywood past which may or may not have roots in reality, Peter Jackson's virtuoso remake of the 1933 classic "King Kong" offers everything for a movie lover to love (and everything for a curmudgeon to hate). Call me amiss, but I must cop to having never seen any of Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" films. Cast-of-Thousands spectaculars have always been distasteful to me. With "King Kong," it seems, Jackson has found a way to keep his megalithic special effects machine working full time whilst paying close attention to a simple plot line (albeit one written for him almost 80 years ago). The resultant film is everything one would expect from a $207 million budget.

The good news is that the story remains intact. The bad news is that the FX, as skillfully as they are employed, remain obtrusive, overwhelming and ultimately distracting. Then again, in a movie about star entertainment attraction --an oversized ape, -- unobtrusive FX would probably be deemed a failure as well. In this case Jackson, remaking a movie he says shaped his childhood and his desire to become a filmmaker, has found a balance as likely to be perfect as any a modern director could reach. The hard thing to get around is that Jackson's glittering Manhattan of the 1930's is envisioned (and then filmed) through eyes of the 21st century. The result is a curious blend of nostalgia and high-technology which, while never less than satisfying, remains always a bit unnatural and disorienting.

The plot should be well known to most readers. Maverick impressario/filmmaker Carl Denham manages to wrangle together a cast and crew to finish filming a movie on uncharted Skull Island and comes away with much more than expected. In addition to dinosaurs and massive insect populations there is an enormous simian worshipped by the locals. The 25-foot tall ape is captured and dragged back to Manhattan eventually falling in love with Denham's leading lady Ann Darrow and his infatuation leads to his downfall. As Denham, Jack Black is masterfully cast, his essential obnoxiousness and egomania working here in his favor. Adrien Brody as writer Jack Driscoll seems to be slumming, while Naomi Watts in the Fay Wray role gives her all and turns in a performance that goes a long way toward humanizing the CGI-animated gorilla and imbueing him with a sympathetic aspect. It becomes obvious that Kong is not trying to abduct Ann, he is trying to protect her from the barbarous humans they are beset with on all sides. What Jackson has over the makers of the original "King Kong" (we won't talk about the Jeff Bridges/ Jessica Lange version here), Merion Cooper and animator Willis O'Brien, comes via two powerfurl weapons: a cast that is superior in every way to the original cast; and a most sophisticated sense of how to integrate high-tech visuals into an ostensibly old-fashioned story. And by the time he is finished pulling off this amazing feat Jackson has made it look like the endeavor was effortless, like it was easy. The director demonstrates an ease and a mastery that is rare, associated most recently with Spielberg and Sinatra. Three hours plus may be a bit long for a meditation on the exploitative nature of show biz, but this version of "Kong" does it with considerable style.

Until The Monkey Lives

baby-ape.jpg


Although I am a big Jack Black fan, I refuse to see the new remake of King Kong. I made this decision a few weeks ago after I first saw a poster for the movie with a close-up of Kong’s face. The ape looked an awful lot like my pug Louie. They both share the same loveable but domineering nature and pushed in nose.

I wouldn’t have given any of this a second thought except that the picture keeps coming up in conversation. The film’s plot about a giant ape that falls hard for a blonde babe and dies on the Empire State Building in a barrage of aerial machine gun fire began to seriously irk me. I’m all for stories about beauty and the beast and love gone wrong. Kong’s obsession with his girl is far more interesting than any traditional boy-meets girl plotline, but by now the ape deserves more respect.

Kong is a true force of nature hailing from an obscure corner of the Pacific called Skull Island, where the bravest locals know better than to set foot. He is feared, respected and wild and therein lies the most frustrating aspect of this story. I’m not saying that Kong should destroy New York and take his trophy bride back to the jungle. Nor do I want to see a Born Free style ending with the ape on Prozac, released in the wild as everybody wipes the tears from their eyes. We need to ‘fess up. It’s time to admit our human frailty in the face of nature’s fury. The monkey lives and we have to learn to live with him.

Our tradition in the west has long been to run roughshod over nature. Americans have embraced this ethos from the wholesale slaughter of the Great Plains buffalo to the proliferation of Hummers. Our inflated sense of entitlement encourages us to play now and pay later, especially since we still refuse to clean up our own mess. Let someone else figure out how to close the hole in the ozone and find somebody else’s kids to fight for cheap oil.

bugeyes4web.gif

Business as usual doesn’t work anymore. The events of the last year have proven that nature is kicking our butts (whether in the form of wind, water, fire or a monster ape). A record number of hurricanes battered the Gulf Coast and Caribbean while the tsunami killed over 200,000 (not to mention the usual death and destruction from mudslides, tornados and earthquakes). While natural disasters are part of life, the real tragedy is our lack of preparedness and concern for the victims. Living with nature not only means conservation, which may actually reduce the devastating effects of climate change, but also the acknowledgment that we need to devote resources to protecting ourselves from these disasters. FEMA’s inept response to Katrina was superseded by the unconscionable lack of a tsunami warning system in the Indian Ocean. It is worth noting that a comprehensive tsunami warning system has existed along the Pacific coasts of the U. S. and Japan for decades.

Changing the ending of a movie is not going to change public policy. But movies do raise public consciousness. King Kong’s defeat furthers the notion that we are the good guys and nature is the enemy that ultimately must be defeated. Instead I’d like Kong to break his chains, stomp on a fleet of Hummers and demolish the penthouse floor of Trump Tower rather than being picked off the Empire State Building once again like a tin duck in a shooting gallery. I want the wise men and women among us to prevail, stop the madness and call a truce before its too late. But I leave those details to the screenwriters who get paid the big bucks for such original ideas. The time has finally come for the monkey to get his due. He’s not a bad guy at heart and as the SUV’s smolder in the distance maybe someone like Mayor Bloomberg can turn to the ape and say, “Kong, you’re doing a heck of a job.”

Brandl and Bullock in Europe
This entry: “Faster Painting! Move! Move!” Part 3.


Brandl and Bullock in Europe This entry: “Faster Painting! Move! Move!” Part 3. (Mark Staff Brandl and Leonard Bullock continue their debate about contemporary painting, as seen in an ever more numerous group of shows in Basel, Switzerland and nearby locales in Europe.)
b+b_intro_3.jpg
......

MSB: De Keyser --- for me his work typifies "wilted" Euro-hip abstraction, oh so debilitated, for curators in the know. On the other hand, for most artworld denizens, Richter is a focal point of any thought on recent painting.

b_b-dek.jpg
Raoul De Keyser painting

LB: Yes, but one isn’t forced to put him in every survey of contemporary painting.. Let’s see just how influential he really is by exclusion. Try leaving him out entirely. The Richter offered isn’t even one of his popular abstract paintings from the last ten years, but a slate-green monochrome mixer from the 70s. In the same room center stage is given to an American lionized by Europeans: Robert Ryman. Six works. The next room privileges Swiss artist John Armleder similarly.

MSB: I know Armleder, assisted editorially on a book centering on an interview with him. I am aware much of his approach is fabricated for success --- he was Koons way before Koons himself. But I tend enjoy the "bounciness" of his work. Armleder’s charmingly cheerful Fluxus-like art brings to mind it’s opposite, art far less playful — the text room?

LB: Requisite, of course. Every “final” must have one. It contains a few works from Remy Zaug--- someone probably unknown to most people reading this, but the dominate "text-art-star" in Switzerland ---, several On Kawara’s, and an extremely amusing John Baldessari which seems out of place. Also present is a Daniel Buren faded, red-striped fabric piece, about a meter high, hung flush to the floor. What was once a novelty (of painting?) is now an historical remnant.

b_b-bald.jpg
John Baldessari painting


b+b-zau.jpg
Remy Zaug painting

I am grateful for a “crack” in the historical frame which allowed one of the best Andy Warhol car-crash works into the show, hung immediately before the entrance to the dry text room. The work was made shortly before the ostensible beginning date of this show, 1968. It’s owned by the museum, so it didn’t have to come far. Early Warhol elicits reflection in a way the later work does not. This series in particular hasn’t lost a compelling visceral spark; it’s still disconcerting to enjoy the oscillating, double-exposed color Ben-Day dots at the victims expense. This is Andy at his snake oil-seller heights as artificer of the ghoulish aspects of American voyeuristic kitsch, before he became its prime purveyor. An example of the later is a portrait displayed on the ground floor.

b_b-warh.jpg
Andy Warhol painting

Bernard Frize is placed in a corner near the spiral stair. His alkyd-on-enamel process paintings are the most voluptuous paintings in the show. Their placement creates the impression that the works have been hygienically isolated from the higher profile “diet doctors” around the corner. One remembers ones body at the moment of encountering Frize’s works.
To Be Continued ........

bimaculate, adj.

BIMACULATE.gif

bimaculate, adj
Having, or marked with, two spots.


"Utter like a public-address system,
like a bimaculated duck, with windup gears."


From "Whale Poem" by Sean Singer .

Clarence in a Car Coat: My "Wonderful Life"

cherub.gif



I don’t know what it is about It’s A Wonderful Life. I’ve seen the damn thing over a dozen times and yet every Christmas when they haul it out of the attic, with the cherished ornaments, shimmering tinsel and fake snow, I can’t look away. Each year I tell myself I’m just gonna watch a couple of scenes: Uncle Billy, drunk with a crow on his shoulder, frantically searching for the wad of cash he rolled up into a newspaper and absentmindedly handed to that slimy bastard Mr. Potter. Or maybe Violet whoring around the seedy, neon-lit streets of Pottersville. That should do it. But this year I wound up watching the whole damn thing again. Maybe it’s because back in the fifties my mom looked a like an ethnic Donna Reed and this is the first Christmas that she’s gone.
No matter how corny Capra’s morality play might be, it shows how we all touch each other’s lives and how each one of us is integral to the whole frickin’ scheme of things no matter how small and insignificant we might feel. As I watch Jimmy Stewart gripe about what a loser his guardian angel Clarence is, it always gets me wondering what kind of poor fool would be assigned to keep an eye on my little drama in return for earning his wings?

Just the other day I was walking down Bleecker Street in the Village when this guy, about seventy years old with white hair and whiskers, in a red and black buffalo plaid wool hat comes up to me. He’s wearing muddy boots and jeans, like he’d just milked the cows. And he’s talking to himself. I catch his drift in mid sentence: “The problem is that everybody’s just so stupid!” he grumbled.

“Just stop and take a look around for a minute, all you see is stupid people,” he said to me. “Look at that guy!” he groused, pointing at some poor schlep. Although I try not to say derogatory things about anyone, I had to agree with him.

“And her, a regular jackass! Hair like an unmade bed!”

“Yeah, now that you mention it. I guess so,” I replied.

“Nobody looks comfortable. Just look at the way they walk, all in a rush or smoking or always on those damn phones they carry around.”

“Yeah, you got that right,” I had to agree with him.

He wasn’t your average old crank. There was something odd, almost other-worldly about the bloke, like he just woke up after passing out after downing a pint of Night Train in Washington Square Park, back in the Eisenhower era and now it’s nearly fifty years later.

“As far as I can tell people have just been gettin’ stupider and stupider. Since World War II, we had the Korean War and Joe McCarthy accusin’ everybody of bein’ communists. Then the Cuban Missile Crisis almost brings us to the brink of nuclear annihilation. And what hell did we go to Vietnam for? Was that stupid or what?” Once more I had to sadly agree with him.

Ring-2.gif“Well, good talking to you pal. Here’s where I get off,” I said, pointing at the door to my apartment building. Suddenly he made a fist and held it right up to my face. “You see that ring?” he growled.

“Yeah! How could I miss it?” I replied.

There was a huge sparkling diamond in a gold setting that looked more like something on a mafia don’s pinky than on some old Rip Van Winkle dude who looked like he’d just crawled out of a dank cave.

“Y’know where I got this ring from buddy?” he said, in a raspy whisper. And before I had a chance to reply, he answered his own question. “Heaven!” he snapped. “And I’ll be returning it any day now!”

“Whoa! Take it easy, man!” was all I managed to say.

“And one more thing,” he said, squinting at me, wondering if I too wasn’t just another idiot. “If you’re smart, you’ll get out of town by August. That’s when the missiles are gonna start flying!”

I thanked the old dude, wondering if he was just plain nuts or if he was indeed my guardian angel sent to put the word out to me. Was this crazy old crank my “Clarence?” Is this my Wonderful Life? Call me next September and I’ll let you know.

January 04, 2006

Serra-nate

torqued.jpg


An exerpt from an interview with Richard Serra, brought to you by


I think this, I think basically I'm not interested in people following my work or making work like my work. But what does interest me is the notion that if you do a lot of work it means there's a potential for other people to understand that a lot of things are possible with a sustained effort and that the broadening of experiences is possible and I think that's all art can be. A little catalyst for change. It's not going to change the world. But it can be a catalyst for thought and thought can change and how people think about what's possible can change and I think that if the work has any value at all on its interpretive level I can't get into how people are going to experience it but if it has any value at all I think it stands for one person understanding that the potential for change is in all of us.

closecurly.jpg

Joel Dorn's NYC:
Volume 2

bear.jpg





boys.jpg





chef.jpg





wigs-1.jpg





legs.jpg


A Far Cry From Dead

poster_r11_c2 copy.jpg












Any self-respecting fan of American music should know who Townes Van Zandt was, and if you don't, chances are you will soon.
When the legendary singer-songwriter died in 1997 his work was well-known and heralded by the likes of Steve Earle, Lyle Lovett, Guy Clark and more. Yet his brilliant songwriting has suffered from a relative obscurity which is certainly way out of proportion to his genius.

As is often the case, death has been something of a slow boon for Van Zandt's career, with the recent completion of a bio by Sharkforum's very own John Kruth, and now this promising bio pic by Margaret Brown. Townes has been on screen before, of course, turning in both humorous and heart-rending scenes in James Szalapski's beautiful 1975 film "Heartworn Highways."

Early buzz on Brown's picture is very positive.

Be Here To Love Me: a film about Townes Van Zandt
by Margaret Brown
Local Screening:
January 6, 2006 - January 12, 2006
Music Box Theater
3733 North Southport Avenue, Chicago, IL 60613

Dandelion Whine

dandelions1.jpg

A field of dandelions in bloom; I’m always suckered in by the brilliant yellows and greens; a salad of color. As Dorothy drifted to sleep on her opiate bed, I want to dive in with apiarian bliss and absorb the rays of the sun. An illusion evidently, because time will undo the beauty- all I’ll be left with is an army of defoliated stems. A ghost town of weeds; no floral Eden. As hope springs eternal, so does the inevitable fall.
I figured out a long time ago that my psyche was shaped by the 1969 Chicago Cubs collapse. As a twelve year-old, I had invested heavily in the summer of hey-hey and holy mackerel. When the season unraveled in an agonizingly slow striptease of error and frustration I should have foreseen that the next spring would deliver an equally devastating result to my first attempt at dating; she said yes to the dance, only to dump me for my best friend two days before the big event. I waited five more years to get back on the saddle only to be bucked once more; this time dumped just before the prom the day after purchasing the tux. So I learned that to truly be happy (I at least had sense to opt for happiness) I would have to live in the moment. Expectations, forecasts, hopes, omens, and predictions were for losers. As Jim Harrison once quoted Charles Vizenor, “The present is a wild season, not a ruse.” Harrison, with only one eye open in the functional sense, has taught me to savor life as it happens. Take in what is before you with all of your senses. What lays behind doors two and three is irrelevant.

dandelions2.jpg

Harrison also wrote that, “as a writer it was his privilege to edit the world.” It is a privilege, one not to be given up so easily or taken away. While I do appreciate the critical eyes and ears of those around me (and I do think that listening is far more worthy than speaking), I cannot cede the responsibility to form my own universe based on observation and judgment. I appreciate the frames that artists put on their work; objects and moments can be captured that would surely be outside my grasp. I think back to Sam Mendes’s silently blowing trash bag in American Beauty; the poetry of movement created from garbage. But true epiphany comes from framing our own visions. I think back to last fall when my wife suggested we participate in a reading group at the Newberry so that we could get the momentum to read Gravity’s Rainbow. The discussion leader was both a scholar and a gentleman and offered educated insights informed by many prior readings. Sitting in those sessions was like going to the dentist though, and we dropped out by page ninety; my true revelations came when viewed through my own lense of experience. What’s the point if framed through academia? I’d be an asshole anyway if all I did was wait for the right moment at a party to slip Slothrop into a conversation. I guess I just did. What an asshole.

So here’s to a museum without walls. Keep an eye out for truth. Use Simone’s word for a day in a complete sentence that means something to you. (Can you tell I’m a middle school language arts teacher?) Take Robert Penn Warren’s advice and yearn “to touch the ironic immensity of afternoon with meaning.”

Chicago Tribune Doppleganger, Echo, Screw Up - HUH?

STOP THE PRESSES!

Oops, too late. This morning's Chicago Tribune ran a duplicate of yesterday's Tempo section page 8. The strange thing was, Tuesday's "Su Doku" puzzle featured the solution to "Tuesday's Puzzle."

Talk about puzzled - I hadn't yet had my requisite pot of coffee to jump-start my brain. .

Pardon Me, Have You Got Any Grey Poupon?

center>wr-5.gif .

Banks

hunned.gif
I only ever robbed one bank. Technically, what I did might fall under the rubric of mail fraud but I still (only occasionally but to this day) will braggingly insist that I once robbed a bank.
The deal went down in a large eastern city I will not name for obvious reasons. Statutes of limitations may come and go but I am no lawyer (obviously) and have no more than a minimal desire to tempt the hands of legalistic fate. So I can only say that the story begins with me fucking up my life monstrously in one city and then, when discovered, being dragged back to another city -- as if with a vaudeville hook -- by my concerned parents. They offered free room, board and psychological consultation at a nearby clinic, all gratis. It was not an offer I found appealing from my dope-perch but it was one I was encouraged to believe I could not refuse. There were implied threats that I no longer can recall but they must have been towering in order to make me go back. Once I got there I refused treatment and immediately began indulging in the sorts of behaviors that had brought me onto my parents' radar screans in the first place. Within 30 days I was asked to leave my new (old) digs. I had to find a job and a pad.

MEN111E.jpgI ended up at a place called the Midtown Hotel, an anonymous and deceptively humble name for a structure grandly erected in the 1920's before the Depression and occupying a lordly overview of an upper middle class neighborhood hard on the heels of the corporate headquarters of America's largest and greatest firm. It was once a midwestern jewel, that neighborhood. That hotel was once comparable to the Commodore or the Stanhope or the Drake. It was still quite nice, at least on the outside

The neighborhood, though, had gone to heroin and, as a new arrival, I should have noticed this immediately and turned and run in the other direction. The truth is, even had I been observant enough to notice the track marks on the pavement, there was probably nowhere else for me to run just at that time. At first I felt pretty cool living in that neighborhood even though I was not availing myself of the many narcotics that were on sale. The whole area was like a farmer's market of drug and weapons dealers and I was blissfully immune to the landmines of their world because I was uninterested and uninvolved (though not unaware).

All of that changed quickly. The hotel owner had been employing me at minor carpentry and painting jobs, spackling, electrical, occasionally plumbing. I was a jack-of-all-trades and a master of none. Then someone got sick and I was asked to do front desk duty -- sorting mail, answering the phone and putting through calls in and out of the 1930's switchboard in the hotel lobby. Walter, my co-worker was somewhat jealous. The other parts of the building were truly decrepit, horrific really, and required lots of tedious, mindless labor. Entire floors had been boarded up and closed off to all but us workers who daily fought a losing battle with the rats and the hemmorhaging plumbing and chipping leaded paint. Goldie, the old Jewish lady who owned the joint and who was widely hated in the neighborhood, seemed to like me. I have since come to believe that she was favoring me with easy assignments back then only as a way to fuck with the other, older employees. She didn't like any of them and they seemed to hate her, and that most definitely included her 'husband,' Bob.

My cushy new posting afforded fringe benefits, mainly the oppurtunity to rifle the mail of any former resident to foolish or secretive to leave forwarding information after they'd departed the hotel. The days mail also usually included letters addressed to former guests who'd had the temerity to die without warning anyone. It seemed to me like this correspondence became mine once I sorted it and ascertained that no one was ever likely to come searching for some missing person's missing letters. How I managed to secure myself in this knowledge I no longer remember. What I do remeber is that quite a few pre-approved credit card options were pouring into the once proud, once glamorous lobby of the Midtown Hotel for transients. There didn't seem any reason to ignore or destroy these offers, at least not right away. Inevitably, with poverty slithering toward me from every direction, it began to seem almost like a moral imperative to fill out these simple forms and avail myself of some serious lines of credit which would otherwise go unused. Perhaps by coincidence all of the cards was backed by the same bank.

When the cards began to arrive sixty days or so later, it was imperative that I quickly come up with a plan for exploiting them and I suppose I did so in a rather hasty fashion. PIN numbers duly arrived by separate mail and the game became cash withdrawls from every possible ATM machine in the city, the more widely spread, the better. Since there were dollar-amount limits each day, the scam would take several nerve-wracking days, perhaps a couple of weeks, to complete. Of course at any time, with surveillence cameras and the like, there was a chance that I would be spotted at the machine and popped like a bubble, like a common junky thief.

And I wasn't even a junky, not yet.

My accomplice was only vaguely aware of what I was doing. He was a tall, stately, black cab driver named Joe Sampson. Sampson had an authorial presence, very intelligent and periodically menacing as in a community theater drama of physical intimidation that played itself out on occasions that seemed to be dictated by the moon and the tides. I knew him because he was a drummer I'd played with and he was a valued friend and competent ally but sometimes a little bit crazy. He was very well-read -- mainly politics and the more intellectual science fiction novels -- but still a down-and-out street urchin like almost everyone around back then. Joe drove me in his taxi one thousand miles on one occasion because I told him I would let him get up on stage and play with Rashied Ali, John Coltrane's last drummer. I did and he did and it sounded very nice. That summer, though, I needed him to drive me hither and yon cleaning out the teller machines of Southeastern ********* in a concerted and deeply illicit effort to raise enough money to relocate out of town. We drove all over that town in its oppressive heat. We passed ancient factories and modern industrial parks, mom and pop bakeries and cafes and valleys of fast food hotboxes, shimmering in their fog of sunlight and grease. There was certainly never any thought given toward making robbery a career, nor was it ever within the realm of possibility for a fellow like me to actually GO INSIDE a bank and rob it, with it without a weapon. I didn't and still do not possess those kinds of steel nerves and brass balls. Nevertheless, I managed to grab a few thousand before I became too scared to continue.

My plan began to break down. I wanted out of town and out of the hotel and its 8-hour days of spackling and pounding and moving and lifting and dunning tenants and killing bugs and answering phones but the plan called for staying put until the inevitable half-hearted police inquiries were finished without solution. Only in that way, I reasoned, would suspicion glance off me harmlessly; if I split, they'll know it was me.

So I stuck with the plan, though it was far more difficult than I had imagined would be the case. Having money made it hard to stay put but I had decided to keep the job and stay in the moldy room. I began to get bored, especially when, after 90 days or so, no police had so much as made a phone call inquiring as to the unpaid balances accruing to credit cards of folks allegedly living in our hotel. Surely the overwheliming concentration of cash withdrawls would have sent up a red flag. I began to get very anxious and very bored at the same time. So I did what any other psychotic criminal would do: I started buying coke.

I must admit that the cocaine killed the boredom but only for a week or so, after which it merely served to intensify my nascent paranoia. 'Nascent' is in fact not a fair word, not nearly strong enough. During that late summer I first found out what paranoia really was, albeit still in only a mild concentration. It was because of the rat.
RollsofMoney.jpg
I'm not sure anymore how long I lived with the rat, certainly no more than a few days. The night the beast obliterated any remote possibility of coexistence started auspiciously indeed. That was the morning I overslept ( of course I overslept, I was up all night the night before, shooting cocaine and wondering how to best leave town and finding no answers) and was awakened by a mildy miffed Walter dragging me to the second floor to paint and kill bugs. I answered the door and let him in, oblivious to the fact that there was a large plate of marijuana sitting on the nightstand next to the rust stained Murphy bed which was still folded into the peeling wall; I had slept in a chair during that early morning. Walter glared at me. "Do you really need it, Paul?" he said. Do really need what? Was he suggesting that I was a pothead? "Do you really have to have it?" he veritably shouted in my face watching for the inevitable fear that accompanies any bust --any finding out --no matter how petty. I began to stammer, grasping at a potential string of words that might form an explanation. That was when Walter slapped my back and started cackling with satanic laughter. "I was just fuckin' with you man..." and all that shit. I later learned that Walter had at the time been studying to become a state police investigator and I realized that I probably should have been much more concerned. I put in full hours that day and then a few more hours on the switchboard and then I went out for a Greek dinner. I took a cab, Joe Sampson's: I never went anywhere in the neighborhood, except up to the corner grocery/diner/liquor store on foot. That summer a hooker had been slashed to pieces in the diner and the whole neighborhood was spooked beyond the pale of the normal violent heroin jive. I still walked to the diner, though. But I digress.

SkullCrossbones.jpg Returning from dinner and remanding my fresh take-home loaf of Greek bread to the tiny
refrigerator, I plopped myself down on the wormy Murphy bed and immediately became aware of a persistent noise. The trap I'd placed in the broken out space behind the refrigerator (where a wall should have been) had managed to catch a ... mouse ... or a rat? It was a rat and it was wounded but not dead. I was starting to assess the situation and the coke was not making the outlook any better. The damned beast was caught but not ready to give up. All night long it dragged the trap around with it, scraping the cement floor (which was innaccessible to me) and screeching at a surprising volume. All the while the cocaine angled its way to the center of my aching head like a slow moving bent arrow greased by the cries of the dying rodent. There was, purely and simply, no escape except the obvious one. In the morning I called Sampson and had him take me to the airport.

rat.jpg In retrospect it was the lack of police concern that unnerved me and sent me running. That and the rats. I made a pretty good haul, all told, and so did Joe Sampson. On the plane out a beautiful black woman sat next to me while I shivered and sniffled. "You must be doin' somethin'," she said, "that don't sound like allergies to me." Indeed. The hotel's owner, Goldie, was found dead a few weeks later, stabbed two dozen times. Her gay 'husband,' Bob, immediately turned up missing. The money was great but it only lasted a few months. Robbing banks is a tough way to make a living.

The Elites that Dare Not Say the Name (Elite), “Precious Moment” Figurines, and an Admonition to Not Mistake Others for Whom They Are Not.

When I was younger and more liable to set aside protective good sense, I made an impromptu and of course impassioned speech about elitism at one of the various meetings I attend as part of my duties as a curator. Mind you, this was at a time when the arts in general were following some directive (it was always unclear exactly how this directive arose) to “reach out” (with outreach programs, of course) to those who might feel the arts, and in the case of museums, the visual arts, were seen as elitist pursuits and were therefore not wont to visit museums.

Both then and now I very much want people to visit museums, all museums great and small, and I thought a lot about how to encourage people to do this. I thought, “In general, people might not be moved to visit museums because they don’t know enough about them to understand what they will get from visiting a museum. They need to be educated that it is in their own self-interest to visit museums, not that it is some sort of societal duty, like voting or yielding the right of way to pedestrians. Museums aren’t a medicine you take to inoculate yourself against being considered low-brow. They are vitamins you take to make your constitution strong, that it might better withstand the stresses of life.”

The reader will perhaps excuse the clumsy tenor of my thoughts. I had been spending a lot of time at the Field Museum of Natural History in these days, and would watch tense parents with kids in tow worrying about “seeing everything” shooing their kids along and thus away from displays they had gotten engaged in. Surely, I thought, this is no way for people to behave in museums! Museums provide space and require time, yes, that might be very intimidating. But they are not mere tourist attractions that one proudly announces one has seen! Perhaps the key is to educate people to understand that in exchange for their time they have a right to a space in which they can not only physically navigate, but mentally expand…and join the elite who has made the same effort in their own lives.

So in my speech I tried to make the distinction between elitism as a negative force — the force that causes those within the club, so to speak, to restrict access to those outside — and a positive force — the force that inspires individuals to take on the challenge to rise to new levels of endeavor and understanding of what it is to be human.

Precious.gifI tried to explain my theory that the Museum of Contemporary Art might wish to consider positioning itself within the notion of contemporary art as an endeavor to which one must devote a great deal of time and energy, true, but an endeavor that was pretty much guaranteed to offer inestimable rewards. I understood this was not entirely in line with the notions of egalitarianism that were increasingly coloring American cultural life. But, I argued, this was the notion that had been behind the founding of the Art Institute in the 19th century and was part and parcel of the peculiar nature of Chicago as it developed into a major city, this emphasis on social uplift, not merely in the arts, but in all realms of urban life. I mean, the Jane Adams Hull House…I desperately cast about to better express myself. In this state of desperation I cited the Marine Corps slogan of that particular era as an example of “positive elitism” — “We are looking for a few good men!” But in uttering this slogan, my passionate speech sputtered to an inelegant close. It wasn't, I felt, so much that my ideas were disagreed with, but that I had couched them badly. The word elite, well, it just wasn't going to fly.

This was years ago. I have continued to follow the arguments that seem to fuel institutional notions about how the visual arts should be presented within the wider societal reality. I have watched the rise of institutional analysis using various management tools originally developed for for-profit concerns (about which I have very strong views and perhaps shall be the subject of a future posting), and I have watched the rise of marketing as a strategy to interest individuals in the arts given how they seem to be able to be interested in buying, say, clothes at Target as opposed to clothes at Sears. And I have seen the extraordinary expansion of the contemporary art world. Yet I have not been able to put any of this together in a way that makes sense to me. Clearly more and more people are following the arts, and visit contemporary art museums and venues. The message I so desperately wanted to convey about museums being spaces for self-expression and growth seems to be getting out there. Yet within the art world I was hearing more and more embittered complaints about the nature of art. A summation of one sort was the recent article by Barry Gewen in the New York Times (“State of the Art,” December 11, 2005) that poses the question: “Has the art world gone crazy?”

When I was first circling around the one who seems now to be known as The Shark — if the reader will allow me to be anachronistic in my metaphor — I was clever enough to deliver a punch to the nose, the one spot where sharks seem to take notice. “My motto is,” I proclaimed, “do not mistake me for who I am not.” Although I was sure he recognized this as being a motto of Friedrich Nietzsche (see Ecce Homo, or How One Becomes What One Is), I felt impelled to point this fact out as well. After all, I was a curator, and he was an artist. The relationship is never easy.

In private discussion about my last article, my good friend Jeff reminded me that I should be perfectly clear about the difference between artists and curators when it comes to what I term “open-mindedness.” While an artist may be open-minded, it is hardly a necessity and probably a drawback; we want artists who are full, strongly opinionated, passionate, dedicated to their vision. That might be a vision that places Al Franken on the highest hill; it may be a vision that finds Laura Ingraham the font of all truth. It is the viewers of art (which I realize of course includes artists!) and those in the institutional art world that one would hope would arm themselves with a broad range of experience, in order to better receive and judge the output of artists.

Yet, while I agree completely with this idea, it seems the lines between “curator” and “artist” are considerably blurred these days. Young artists freshly minted in absolutely frighteningly large numbers are coming out of art schools with “curatorial practices” courses under their belts inculcated with the idea, seemingly not examined in any way, that there is little difference between being an artist and a curator — these things are merely be two sides of the same creative practice. And then there are concrete examples. What curators do seems to be increasingly considered “artistic” rather than “art historical” and what artists do is considered as making an artwork in a larger or more social realm than the studio. A good example, ‘wrested from the headlines,’ so to speak, is Rirkrit Tiravanija, whom incidentally I knew ‘back in the day’ as a young participant in the Randolph Street Gallery scene (the late, great RSG) that included Jeanne Dunning, Inigo Manglano-Ovalle, Hirsch Perlman, Dan Peterman, Tony Tasset and many others. Gentle, retiring Rirkrit was the last person I would have tapped as becoming an international art superstar, but in fact he is the first of the group to receive a profile in The New Yorker. Could it be because he has a dual role in the international art world, and thus can cleave to both the artist part of the elite as well as the curator part. Oh, there I uttered that word again.

What I would hope we could all be open-minded about is our own complicity in and responsibility toward the aristocracy, as The Shark puts it. (Well, that word is pretty troublesome too, isn’t it, Shark!?) In short, is it possible to bring the positive aspects of the term “elitism” to the fore? We who love art have a lot of hard work to do, I think: we should make every effort to work against elites, if they exist, that keep “them” outside. That is clearly wrong. We should make every effort to resist the dumbing down of things down to a level where there seems to be no elite, but in fact there is more of an elite than ever — those who can congratulate themselves for “giving access” to those deemed “less fortunate.” Is it possible to develop the idea of “elite” as likeminded people who keep in mind that it is their effort, passion, and dedication that allow them to be so described?

One further anecdote. More than a decade ago, I had a passionate friend (an artist, marrying an artist) for whom I needed to buy a wedding shower gift. I thought a book that catalogued all the “Precious Moments” figurines was the perfect gift, in a cynical, ironical, funny way. Who would collect these things anyway! They are so…well…precious. (See www.preciousmoments.com) Yet when I actually looked at the book, I realized it wasn’t that dissimilar from my own effort of the time to create a catalogue raisonné of the work of H.C. Westermann. Yes, I could yuck it up about ‘those people’ who collect Precious Moment figurines even as I realized they could scratch their heads over my desire to record every Westermann sculpture ever made, or we might look one another in the eye and realize the gulf wasn’t nearly so wide as we thought…well yes, I realized, this purchase of a wedding shower gift was yet another gift from the gods, designed to keep me on my toes…..

More later….

Lynne.

insufflate, v.

insufflate.gif
insufflate, v.
1. To blow or breathe into or on.
2. To treat medically by blowing a powder, gas, or vapor into a bodily cavity.

"I kissed you like a shipwreck,
like one who insufflates the word."


From "Fons" by Pura López-Colomé, translated by Forrest Gander



simonelSM.jpg More Blogs by Simone Muench | EMail Simone


I Live Under a Flight Path

I_Live_Under.jpg
I live under a flight path





Tangled.jpg
Tangled





Home.jpg
Home





Frame.jpg
Frame





exit.jpg
Exit





Spring flight.jpg
Spring's flight





January 03, 2006

SHARKsposure: Flavorpill and The Reader

Not even a month old, and we're getting some more push:

051230_outerwrap.gif flavorpill

The Chicago Reader (Adobe PDF file) .

Excellent NYC Art Criticism Website

john_haber.gif





Haberarts Art Criticism Website

One of my favorite writers on art is not a professional critic, nor art historian, nor artist, nor curator --- he's not even getting paid for it! His name is John Haber.
John Haber has his own website of art criticism and related short essays.

While he writes almost exclusively about art in New York City, due to its position as Center of The Art World and due to Haber's captivating perceptions, I believe it is rewarding reading for all artworld denizens. I highly recommend it to all Sharkforum visitors, whether you check it out regularly, or only occasionally seek out specific topics or people using his excellent internal search function and/or extensively crisscrossed hyperlinks. Haber says of himself:

"John Haber is an editor and writer living in New York. He grew up (so to speak) just three blocks from the Guggenheim and half a mile from the Met, but he never entered either voluntarily. His native language is rumored to be artspeak, if you can believe his own dictionary, and he still writes with an accent.

John may not be a Jew unless you call him Jewish, although he often thinks you should. He hates the design he created for his Web page, but he's only a critic, a bookish sort, a museum saboteur, gossip columnist, and perhaps even a fiction."

His greatest hits links page can be found HERE.

Not an extraordinary machine: Sony mucks with another musician

Nellie-McKay-ray-pride.gif

The allegedly 21-year-old, certainly talented singer-songwriter Nellie McKay ('mi-KAI') has two strikes against her in one month. First, a few new tunes go to waste in the awful movie Rumor Has It, and, reports the NY Times, she's the latest musician to be told by the suits that she doesn't suit their biz plans.
Notably, she concedes that despite a recent spate of firings at Columbia, the label which also was instrumental in delaying Fiona Apple's "Extraordinary Machine," the ruckus has less to do with the album and "had more to do with my personality."

As the Times puts it, "McKay, a young singer-songwriter whose 2004 album, 'Get Away From Me,' was one of the most acclaimed pop debuts in recent years, says she has been dropped by Columbia Records just as her follow-up was scheduled to reach stores... Ms. McKay had been negotiating for some time with the label over the length and final song selection of 'Pretty Little Head,' ...which was supposed to be released today...The London-born, Harlem-based Ms. McKay had been fighting with the label over her insistence on a 23-song, 65-minute version of the album; Columbia was pressing for a 16-song, 48-minute version... At recent shows, Ms. McKay had given out the personal e-mail address of the [now-fired] Columbia chairman, Will Botwin, from the stage, encouraging fans to lobby [for] the longer album. "I thought we had resolved things favorably," Ms. McKay said. "We were just finalizing the artwork." She's one of the more electric performers I've seen in ages; the streaky pic is from Sundance 2005, where a breathless McKay ran through her wordy, verby songbook at a singer-songwriter showcase that also featured Yo La Tengo. Frantic, frazzled, political, talky and in gorgeous voice, she was easily my favorite bad motherfucker of that festival.

tympanic, adj.

tumpanic.gif

tympanic, adj.
1. Relating to or resembling a drum.
2. also tympanal. Anatomy. Of or relating to the middle ear or eardrum.
"The tympanic thought
worth less than a walnut."

From "A Fickle Sonance" from Circulation Flowers by Chuck Stebelton



simonelSM.jpg More Blogs by Simone Muench | EMail Simone


Breakfast With Buddy

chess50th_.jpg




A friend of mine once asked me what the biggest difference between Buddy Guy and Jimi Hendrix was.

My answer: "A plane ticket." Buddy told me about the one and only time Leonard Chess asked him up to his office. He was holding Hendrix's first album in his hands as he apologized to Buddy for not letting him get his loud and wild club sound on recording. The Hendrix record was exploding all across Europe and beginning to show the same sales momentum here in the states, as well. Buddy's big, wild feedback sound had been a no-no in the Chess studio for more than a few years.

At Chess, you played by the rules if you wanted to work. Maybe it was that way at every American label. All the new and experimental recording techniques were coming out of London at that time. Leonard Chess wasn't looking for any innovators, just sales. A bull headed entrepreneur who gave the public what they wanted and paid his artists whatever he thought was their fair share. It was the only place in town for black musicians to strut their stuff. They got you out there and kept you there. As the world changed around it...it didn't. In spite of Chess' rigid, non-artistic outlook on the music business, the label spawned more music innovators in a short time than probably any other label in history.

When you think on Hubert Sumlin, Muddy Waters, Jimmy Rogers, Little Walter, Howlin' Wolf, Willie Dixon and of course, Buddy Guy all in the same room at one time, it's hard to believe somebody ain't making it up. Like some condensed version of history to make it all fit into a two-hour movie. But facts are facts. All you have to do is read a personnel list on any given song from those early Chi-town blues years to let you know that what was...was. But being black in America was neither a selling point nor a novelty in the early sixties, and certainly not exotic, the way Hendrix must have seemed to a waiting, jungle fevered London blues scene.

bringem.gif I've opened for Buddy a few times over the years, including at his club, Legends, during his annual three week long January marathon of gigs he stages every year. I'd play my set and then watch him rip through his take-no-prisoners show. The thing about Buddy that's different from most musicians young or old is his willingness to go out on the limb at every show I've ever seen. He digs the uncharted waters, no matter how treacherous and is willing to fall flat on his face, just as long as some new unexpected musical moment happens. I've seen him stop a song dead in its tracks and start another one the minute he feels it ain't getting him there. Nothing pat about his shows. This ain't no by-the-numbers blues review. And when he finds that shining moment, all of us along for the ride start purring like kittens. The other thing I've noticed is the wild emotional ride he takes himself on while he's playing. The anger, the evil, love, joy, sadness and sex are all right up there in plain view. It actually has scared me a couple of times. Almost like staring into the eyes of a killer. There's no mistaking it when you see it. Too much truth. He'd make a lousy lawyer.

So it was with some anxiety that I committed to having Buddy appear on my bi-weekly radio show on XRT called The Eclectic Company. I wasn't sure which Buddy I was going to get. The possessed gunslinger? The soul shouter? The quiet, shy Buddy? Then there was the aspect of performing a couple of songs together on the air. Would he rip me a new one? For some reason all this stuff swam through my mind the night before the taping. Realizing I hadn't picked up my Dobro in a while I decided to spend a little time before bed warming up my hands and soul so that tomorrow I wouldn't have to introduce myself to my own guitar. My son was playing his guitar in the other room, so I decided to invite him in and teach him how to play the blues, as I needed someone to play off of, unaware of the rare poetry this moment would resonate just ten hours later when the next person I'd be dueting with was Buddy Guy.

8track.jpgI showed up at 9:45 in the morning at the station, fifteen minutes before the very prompt Mr. Guy walked through the door. As it turned out, all my worries were for naught. Buddy was as kind and polite a man as anyone I've ever talked to. His life was an open book full of insider stories on those early days of Chicago blues as well as his growing up in the poor and often cruel South of the last mid-century. This is neither a man basking in his own good fortune of recent years nor a bitter warrior of the unheralded past. He is the last great ambassador of a historic time and place in our American history and has accepted the role of setting the record straight with truth and generosity. His stories were funny, tough, to the point, and sometimes a little sad.

We spoke on Little Walter for a while after playing one of his early Chess sides. Buddy recalled how before Walter, no one had ever electrified a harmonica and had made it wail and cry like him. How he had single handedly changed the instrument forever. At this point in the conversation Buddy's voice was filled with emotion. He went on to say that it seemed a crime that the Hohner Company (harmonica maker) had never made a harp under his name or acknowledged his contribution to the instrument at all. At this point, I realized if I didn't change the subject soon Buddy would probably burst into tears, so we moved on. As our conversations continued, I began to realize how tough it is to be in Buddy's position. He's more like a widower than a conqueror. You can hear the sadness in his voice when he speaks on a musician from his past that couldn't hang on long enough to finally get the recognition they deserved. So few colleagues left. So few conversations now that a nod or a wink will suffice. No more inside jokes amongst fellow travelers. Just protégés like myself, waiting and hanging on every word.

We played a couple numbers together and in his true gentlemanly form, Buddy gave me the solos. Dig that!

In closing, I thanked Buddy for being my guest on the show. I told him that my birthday was in a couple of days and that this was the best present a boy ever had. He asked me how old I was going to be. "Forty-six," I said. He said that when he was out with Muddy back in the day, he was the young one. On his birthdays the old guys would ask him how old he was and he would tell them. He then said to me, "Now I'm going to tell you what they used to tell me: Forty-six? You're still wet behind the ears."



(The Eclectic Company radio show with Buddy Guy can be heard at 10pm on Tuesday, January 10th on 93.1, WXRT or streamed at 93xrt.com)

Artists and Curators at Work, Rush Limbaugh, and a Gentle Exhortation on the Importance of Seeing All Sides

Originally posted December 15, 2005 -- I attended a panel discussion the other day, "Local Engagement: Museum Curators Speak" which featured four "younger" curators (although they weren't all young, and some had been in their posts for a number of years) as part of the ongoing "Artists At Work" series sponsored by the Chicago Department of Cultural Affairs under Barbara Koenen's capable supervision. (Check out their excellent website, here,)




Presenting were four curators from major Chicago institutions - the Art Institute of Chicago (Lisa Dorin), the Museum of Contemporary Art (Tricia Van Eck), the Illinois State Museum (Robert Sill) and UIC's Gallery 400 (Lorelei Stewart). I don't go to very many panels discussions these days, so maybe I'm just very out of touch, but I have to say I was rather taken aback at the small number of people in attendance.


Yes, artists in Chicago carry on almost pathologically about how difficult things are for artists



Here were four curators from important institutions, including the Art Institute and Museum of Contemporary Art (where I am also a curator) and there were maybe thirty people to take in what these figures, who very well could control their artistic lives, had to say. That's approximately eight people per curator. You'd think artists would jump at the chance to interact directly with such figures, who are often accused of failing to get out into the community. Yes, artists in Chicago carry on almost pathologically about how difficult things are for artists. That they aren't being properly paid attention to, especially by local institutions. Curators don't visit their studios; collectors don't buy their art, writers don't write about it either.



The scant attendance reminded me that years and years ago (probably the 1980s) I had given a lecture - my topic was "your responsibilities as an artist" - for Northwestern University's art department. And I really lectured those in attendance: Go visit your local museums! Get to know the staffs of these institutions! Get to know whether these institutions have anything to offer you! The audience of artists and art students sat in numbed silence, as if too much was being asked of them. I have often wondered if even one of my lecturees took my advice. Much the same advice was sagely offered at this panel discussion.



My colleague, Tricia Van Eck, exhorted artists not to waste their time sending out their information packets indiscriminately. Get to know an institution; find out whether it even fits what it is you are doing as an artist! Again, the audience sat in numbed silence. In those moments I would like to assign all potential audience members for panel discussions to attend a black church and perhaps learn how one might better participate. Some well-placed "amens" or "we hear you's" would be refreshing.

Yet as the audience seemed constrained and perhaps even timid, the panelists were confident. They outlined what their respective institutions did for the local artist community, and spoke of how they went about deciding who and what to show.


Get to know an institution; find out whether it even fits what it is you are doing as an artist! Again, the audience sat in numbed silence.




A lot of very good information was distributed. Yet I was feeling feisty, perhaps in reaction to the numbing politeness of the room. So during the q & a, in response to many comments about artists using their studios and practices as information conduits that they could better deal with issues that favored buzzword of the moment - I asked: "What resources out in the world as opposed to the often insular confines of the art world do you access?" When the panelists sat seemingly in stunned silence at my question, I clarified: "Ah, like, do any of you listen to Rush Limbaugh?"



Ah, I had pressed the right button. Not only was there a stirring in the audience, my questions instantly set off a chorus of murmurs and the panelists couldn't wait to respond. Lorelei Stewart answered me first. With her face curled with some disdain she said, "No, I don 't listen to Rush Limbaugh." I again clarified, "Well, it was a rhetorical question. What I 'm trying to get at is what kind of information do you take in so that you can properly evaluate the production of artists who are dealing with the issues of contemporary life?" And so she clarified, "Well of course I stay in touch. I travel. I go to movies, concerts, and so on, although I wish I had more time for that sort of thing. I listen to NPR and read the New York Times."



I had pressed the right button. Not only was there a stirring in the audience, my questions instantly set off a chorus of murmurs




At this point I will take my own advice and mutter "Amen." I could have predicted this answer with half my brain tied behind my back. For those of you who don't recognize my reference, that's one of Rush Limbaugh's tag lines. I first started listening to Rush Limbaugh regularly probably ten years ago, after I heard a girl artist at a party savagely ejaculating her opinion of him to a friend: "God, I hate him. I tell you what I'd love to do. I'd love to f---k him to death!" I stared openly at this young lady, thinking, "I'm sorry to tell you this, girl artist, but I suspect that Mr. Limbaugh might decline your offer of such a pleasurable death," for she wasn't much to look at, was wearing dirty, mannish clothes, and was very coarse (obviously) in her language.



It amused me that a young woman who had grown up with all the benefits that the women's movement had achieved would think the best way to deal with someone she detested was to use her sex. But I reminded myself such is the lifework of artists, to present paradox, or so I have been told.
I had listened to Rush Limbaugh from time-to-time at this point, as the local 50,000 watt blow torch, WLS, carries his program and I was spending a lot of time in my car in those days. When I first started tuning-in Rush was carrying on about the spotted owl. I found it almost impossible to listen to. Not only was I appalled by what he had to say - he was giving recipes for spotted owl stew or some such thing - as I have been a conservation-minded person since I participated in the 4-H Club growing up in rural Missouri, I couldn't stand his explosive voice and hyperbolic tone. But there wasn't much to listen to on the AM dial, and I was spending a lot of time in my car, so I kept tuning in.



Gradually I realized I had been making the basic mistake of expecting what I heard to conform to my druthers - I do prefer polite give-and-take, being the fifth child in a family of seven. I realized I was taking Rush literally when he was deliberately being hyperbolic and facetious. I had failed to let myself consider that he is an entertainer as well as a pundit, and had turned off my sense of humor completely. After I figured out that I needed to relax, lay aside my expectations of what should be said and listen to what was actually being said (in other words, open my mind), I realized I found Rush Limbaugh to be very funny.



I realized I was taking Rush literally when he was deliberately being hyperbolic and facetious



And I felt I was really hearing a different side of things. But perhaps at this point I should clarify. My political education consists of a single seminal experience that occurred I was in my early twenties. Not many can point definitely to the moment when the scales fell from their eyes, so I suppose I should be thankful. But at the time it was devastating, as of course I was young, idealistic, and liberal - wasn't everybody? You see, a few short weeks after subscribing to Rolling Stone magazine, a big financial commitment at a time when I was surviving on about $200 a month, I started receiving solicitations from the Army, enthusiastically requesting that I consider enlisting.



Mind you, this was while the Viet Nam War was still on! The way my name and address appeared on these solicitations was exactly the way I had penned it when I signed up, convinced it was the organ of my generation, for Rolling Stone. My youthful idealism was crushed in one fell swoop as I put two and two together: counter-cultural icon Jann Wenner was selling his magazine's subscription list of hip young people to the U.S. Army. I mean, this was when there still was a draft! (And in the interest of full disclosure, I eventually did consider enlisting in the Army, when I found that my expensive art school education had left me with no viable career.) This experience set me on the path of subscribing to a wide variety of magazines (after canceling my subscription to Rolling Stone).

My youthful idealism was crushed in one fell swoop as I put two and two together: counter-cultural icon Jann Wenner was selling his magazine's subscription list of hip young people to the U.S. Army




I wanted to hear all sorts of voices, not just what was deemed "correct," so I subscribed to The Nation and The National Review. I read the New York Times and the Chicago Sun-Times (well, they do have better sports coverage). I read The Face and The National Enquirer, finding them two sides of the same fantastical coin. I sought out the Black Panther Party newsletter and ducked occasionally into the local Christian Science Reading Room to peruse their Monitor.



I was especially careful not to develop an opinion based on what was being said in what is now fondly referred to as the "mainstream media", as my own rudimentary interactions with the press as I began my career as a curator showed me that they almost never got everything correct. Either the name was spelled wrong (it is Lynne with an "e" I would tirelessly say), the title was wrong, or the name of the museum was wrong (I can't tell you how often I stressed that "The Chicago Modern Art Museum" is not the same thing as The Museum of Contemporary Art). I'm not talking about matters open to interpretation and analysis tho I started thinking, I must admit, that people who can't get the basic facts right might have a problem with the rest of the content as well.The only reporter who ever did get all the facts right in an article about one of my endeavors was Jeffrey Zaslow, when he wrote for The Wall Street Journal.



Of course, he then became an advice columnist for the Sun-Times and then seemed to disappear. All too typical, I could lament, if I were a cynical sort. These days, I tune in Rush Limbaugh pretty regularly (if I'm not listening to Catholic Radio (Relevant Radio 820 AM), a little-accessed resource in the art world, I'm sure), but what I really listen to is what Rush's callers have to say. I hear opinions that I don't hear on NPR or read in the New York Times tho' I am sure most art-world readers, having decided that I must be a conservative, might imagine I ritually burn.



Yet I also know my brothers, raised in a pro-labor union, knee-jerk Democratic party household where JFK was a god, have all become increasingly conservative (well all of them except the youngest, a certified Yuppie) after listening to Rush Limbaugh. My brother Neal, an ornery cuss who lives off the grid on a sailboat - hardly the profile of your typical Republication - said he had been force-fed the idea that Republicans were close-minded and only cared about what went on in others' bedrooms until he started listening to Rush, and that Rush and his callers opened his mind to a whole new way of thinking. Yes, he's college educated, as are all my brothers, and he is in the majority in his political leanings in this country, believe it or not, art world denizens. I'll have more to say on this in future postings.



Please, I say to people in the art world (although it is like shouting into the wind) don't be afraid to listen to Rush Limbaugh (tho' I would avoid Sean Hannity). He has some interesting things to say, and even if you don't find them interesting because you've decided he's an idiot (a popular stance these days amongst the elites, but that'll be the topic of my next posting, the elite that dares not speak the name elite) if you truly are a "cultural leader," as artists have been taught to think of themselves, you need all sides of the story, not just the line NPR is wont to give.



I mean, how many heart-string jerking stories about disadvantaged youth and heart-warming humorous anecdotes from David Sedaris can one listen to? About as many woe-is-me, the-Chicago-artworld-doesn't-care-about-us stories I have heard from artists over the years, I suppose. Perhaps there is even a relationship between these two things: for every story about disadvantaged youth there arises a gripe in the mind of the listening Chicago artist about how disadvantaged Chicago artists are, and for every David Sedaris tale, the artist feels cheated that he or she isn't as well known. After all, Mr. Sedaris emerged in the 1980s out of the Chicago art scene...



More later,


Lynne

January 02, 2006

Faster Painting! Move! Move!” Part 2

b&b_intro_2.jpg Brandl and Bullock in Europe This entry: “Faster Painting! Move! Move!” Part 2. (Mark Staff Brandl and Leonard Bullock continue their debate about contemporary painting, as seen in a brace of shows in Basel, Switzerland and nearby locales in Europe.) ......
LB: I’m afraid I can’t agree with your enjoyment of any linear Brice Marden. In the company of De Kooning and Newman the Marden looked decorative.

b&b-marden.jpg
Brice Marden painting.

MSB: Whereas I see them as subtle and refined, purposefully slow.
LB: Hyper-refined! ... Listen before we begin to sound like film critics Siskel and Ebert...
MSB: Hey – I like that comparison! Let’s pick up on that later.
LB: Returning to discussing the whole program of exhibitions, I can’t be alone in the feeling that, to an extent, the shows in Basel comprising Painting on the Move had been decided by the same committee system that sets the standard, tried and true, many a year at the Rose Parade or the Euro-song contest. Curators of these “new painting” exhibits have smoothed any potential differences with the powers beyond themselves. Accomplishing all such requirements seems to have been a challenge. However, although apologies and appeasements abound, painting does come forward showing that it still breathes, palpitates and conceives — a spectacle for those captious enough to believe something as intrinsic to culture as painting could evaporate over a decade, a generation, or even a century.

b&b-tuymans.jpg
Luc Tuymans painting

MSB: Leonard, you were describing the terribly boring committee-consensus form of so many painting shows. That's quite true of a large amount of the exhibitions mounted today in all media. Sophistic consensus-reasoning is ruining art. However, a completely different question arose in There is No Final Picture – Painting after 1968, the show at the Museum für Gegenwartskunst. It had the toughest grouping, an emphasis on paintings which while often wonderful, were trying their best to be the last painting, or the first. This was a perfect summation of the Late Modernism under study here. Highlights were the handful of works not trying to do this, though. One such was Niele Toroni’s Empreintes de pinceau n. 50, répétées à intervalles réguliers de 30 cm, 1975. On another note, Luc Tuymans seems to be all the talk, but looking at his K.Z. (Concentration Camp), 1998... I had a long private talk with him recently and found him to be a delightfully intriguing thinker... Nevertheless, I don’t always "get it" in his approach (or others borrowing from him) — dry, industrial, quasi-“bad painting” realism . Seems far too concocted, an appeal to trendy curatorial conceits, if I may speak so overly general. (Some of his work I actually enjoy a lot.)

b&b-toroni.jpg
Niele Toroni painting

LB: This is easily the most polemical of all the shows and interested me more than the Kunstmuseum’s exhibition. Although the title makes an attempt to evade the endgame gambit, the results “read” THEORY and many of the usual end-of-art tactics are in whining abundance. In some cases here these works have only nominal association with painting concerns. Why, otherwise would Sherrie Levine be represented, other than the tale of the sale...?. Thankfully, the claims of the subtitle-cum-“working theme” are tangential to some paintings here. One would be confounded in an attempt to recognize “final picture” issues in the works of Herbert Brandl, Raoul De Keyser or Tuymans, who you mentioned. They seem more readable as eclectic, hybrid versions of “tradition.”
Gerhard Richter has famously ridiculed the posturing of philosophy disguised as art critique and is duly punished here by tepid representation. Sigmar Polke is also given only token presence in an uncharacteristically drab felt collage, more object than painting. From across the room it might be mistaken for one of Joseph Beuys’ objects. It isn’t necessary to see the “proper” ratio proportionally of a currently influential artist in every show, but this slights the artists by displaying lesser works.
To Be Continued ........

Reflections of Chicago #1

reflections1.jpg





reflections2.jpg





reflections3.jpg





reflections4.jpg





reflections5.jpg

concupiscence, n.

concupiscience.gif
concupiscence, n.
1)Strong desire, especially sexual desire; lust.
2)In theology, concupiscence refers to one's desire, either for good or evil.

(Concupiscence is from Late Latin concupiscentia. The adjective form is concupiscent. A related word is Cupid, the ancient Roman god of love.)


"Call the roller of big cigars,
The muscular one, and bid him whip
In kitchen cups concupiscent curds."

From "The Emperor of Ice Cream" by Wallace Stevens

Poem of the Week:
"Early Style" by Joshua Clover

10497.jpg










Joshua Clover is the author of The Matrix (2005) and Madonna anno domini (1997). He is Associate Professor of Poetry and Poetics at the University of California, Davis, and contributes to the Village Voice and The New York Times. His book The Totality for Kids will be released in April by The University of California Press.
Early Style



Ruins is utopia

From the perspective of

Before melancholy

And sex at the level of

Language promenading

Around the littoral of first

Failures of the codex

Colored morning

Pointing out over this

Being being being-left-empty



Purchase at The University of California Press.

January 01, 2006

A Reason To Get Your Hands Dirty

Rauschenberg's Combines/The Metropolitan Museum of Art/December 30, 2005

rau1.jpg

Robert Rauschenberg's Combines are just that - combinations of materials and objects that forty-five years ago were not the stuff that large-scale art was made of. He includes bits of weather-worn signs that once graced shop fronts, old tires, cans, stuffed animals (most famously the goat in Monogram (1955-59) and a bald eagle in Canyon (1959). These materials challenged art audiences still trying to grasp Jackson Pollack’s aggressively enigmatic paint splashed canvases, to further question their concept of art and even more importantly, beauty. Other artists before Rauschenberg had created collages out of unlikely materials, including Kurt Schwitters and Joseph Cornell’s elegant boxes. But by bringing collage to such a large scale, Rauschenberg’s intent and process of combining color and texture feels all the more arbitrary and perfect.
s1714.jpg
The shirtsleeves, newspapers and other bits of daily life glued to Rauschenberg’s canvases brings the artist's process to the forefront and forces us to look at the clutter of our lives - in our apartments, offices and trash cans. One can visualize the artist surrounded by paint, hammer and nails, picking through odds and ends collected from second hand shops and trash heaps, constructing these deliberate and compelling Combines.


Collages are a sum of their parts but in Rauschenberg’s case those parts carry messages of their own, gleaned from our personal and collective associations with ordinary objects that most viewers rarely bothered to notice until Rauschenberg placed them, cleverly and in a deceptively easy way into his work. Rauschenberg’s original audience recognized them as bits of their everyday lives, glued and nailed to canvas and wood. Yet it is hard to forget that over forty years have passed since these pieces were first exhibited, as their messages continue to evolve. Walking through the exhibition I was struck by the nostalgia emanating from the bits of signs, old comic strips and, yes, even the stuffed animals. I was conscious of Rauschenberg’s defining Pop Art sensibility but also of the America of the fifties and early sixties, a world that once embraced new technologies, looked forward to placing a man on the moon and feared what he might bring back with him.

T629189A.jpg

Rauschenberg's work reflects the cultural change and challenge to the status quo that was rife during the late 50’s and early 60s. His juxtaposition of objects, the stuffed pheasant standing atop a canvas covered with bits of paisley and striped fabric, stained doilies and an old sock in Satellite (1955) or the umbrella topping the fragile construction of The Tower (1957) screams that the times were clearly a-changin’ as loudly as any folksong yet to be written. I found myself constantly enchanted by artifacts of an America of which I am too young to remember. I kept returning to the ironic and timeless beauty in this work, essentially constructed of discarded scraps of our parents’ and grandparent’s lives that still transcend history and analysis.


Great art inspires me to get to my studio ASAP. I don’t care to analyze the work or think about the artist’s place in history, I just take it in on an intuitive level and see its effects once I have a paintbrush in hand. The Met’s exhibition of Rauschenberg’s Combines kept me from running back to my studio for the afternoon. In addition to the amorphous inspiration to create, this exhibition makes me do exactly what I suspect the artist intended, to think about the nature of beauty, its presence in our mundane surroundings and the artists’ job of illuminating beauty for the rest of the world to see. This is no easy task considering today’s audience expects art to appear in a slick package with clean edges or, more often, in a digitized format that hits us hard and fast and is gone with the click of a mouse. And now back to my studio, to get my hands dirty, making stuff with paint, canvas, some wood or whatever else is lying around.

Happy New Minute

newyear.gif
.

Shark Attack in Living Color

Devil.jpg





Wesley_04.jpg





Wesley_03.jpg





WATERLOO.jpg





NAPOLEON copy.jpg





Wesley_01.jpg

betabottom.jpg
gimmemore.gif

by david roth

by Simone Muench

by Ray Pride

by Simone Muench

by Simone Muench

by Wesley Kimler

by Wesley Kimler

by Simone Muench

by John Kruth

by Ray Pride

by david roth

by Norbert Marszalek

by Marilyn Cvitanic

by Simone Muench

by James Beckman

by david roth

by Rick Rizzo

by Paul K

by Simone Muench

by Simone Muench

by Nicholas Tremulis

by Simone Muench





Biz


CONTACT SHARKFORUM





movabletype.gif
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2
movabletypeID.gif



link-cb.gif



apple.jpg

Made on a Mac





fin